Reading this document made me believe that fragment should NOT be deprecated and the support for fragment would be better in long-term. I personally agree on such observations and conclusions. I support the publication of this document. Thanks authors for gather these value information.
Sheng >-----Original Message----- >From: v6ops-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf >Of Fred Baker >Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 2:00 AM >To: v6...@ietf.org >Subject: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC > >This is to initiate a two week working group last call of >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop. Please read it now. >If you find nits >(spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the >authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a >statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed, >please post your comments to the list. > >We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the >document as well as its content. If you have read the document and >believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important >comment to make. >_______________________________________________ >v6ops mailing list >v6...@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
