[cross-posting 6man / 6lo]

Samita Chakrabarti et al,

Great draft which addresses important issues for low-power wireless network 
technologies.

After reading the draft, it seems to me that you would benefit adding one more 
use case -
and addressing the derived requirement(s).

Proposed use case:
-------
A.7.  Set-and-forget off-line networks
    Home control modules designed for networked environments may be deployed  
    in very simple settings like garden path lighting controlled by wireless  
    light and motion sensors. Once the network has been created and sensors  
    have been associated with the light modules, the installer takes away the  
    configuration tool which was used to set up the network. Most likely a ULA  
    prefix is used, since multiple hops may be needed. None of the sensors and  
    light modules has the capability of handing out fresh prefixes. Thus, for  
    a set-and-forget style off-line network to work, the nodes must be  able to
    operate forever without trying to refresh its address registration.

    In another instance of an off-line network, a key-fob style remote control 
is paired
    to a few lamp modules. The controller creates its own small off-line 
network.
    The controller is not only battery powered and sleeping. It is far away in 
its owner's pocket.
    Address registration is not possible.
 
     The manufacturer of the lamp module wants to sell exactly the same lamp
     module to large network deployments where address registration is used.
     Since this class of devices provide no local configuration interface, the 
behaviour needs
     to be controlled via some sort of auto-configuration.
-------
(end of proposed use case) 


One solution could be to introduce a special interpretation of registration 
lifetime 0xFFFF as infinite
and stating that default routers SHOULD NOT advertise this value.

Such an approach would resemble existing text in RFC4861:

 Valid Lifetime
                      32-bit unsigned integer.  The length of time in
                      seconds (relative to the time the packet is sent)
                      that the prefix is valid for the purpose of on-link
                      determination.  A value of all one bits
                      (0xffffffff) represents infinity.  The Valid
                      Lifetime is also used by [ADDRCONF].


The authors may have other preferred solutions?


Thank you,
  Anders
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to