In conclusion, the problem was with my subnet adressing. My /48 being 2001:1620:f2e, the /64 2001:1620:f2e1 was outside of the range! What a stupid mistake. Sorry for all the bother and happy IPv6ing to all.
Cheers, Noth Erik wrote: > Op 8-1-2011 1:50, Paul de Weerd schreef: >> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:55:53PM +0100, Erik wrote: >> | $ traceroute6 2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec >> | traceroute6 to 2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec >> | (2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec) from 2001:610:600:3ed::2, 64 >> | hops max, 12 byte packets >> | sendto: No route to host >> | 1 traceroute6: wrote 2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec 12 chars, >> ret=-1 >> | *sendto: No route to host >> | traceroute6: wrote 2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec 12 chars, >> ret=-1 >> >> That's not what I see: >> >> [we...@impreza] $ traceroute6 2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec >> traceroute6 to 2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec >> (2001:1620:f2e1:0:20d:b9ff:fe17:bfec) from >> 2001:7b8:3af:0:213:72ff:febc:66f7, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets >> 1 tuna.weirdnet.nl 0.458 ms 0.424 ms 0.411 ms >> 2 gw-730.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net 7.892 ms 8.063 ms 8.055 ms >> 3 sixxs-gw.jun1.bit-1.network.bit.nl 7.889 ms 8.535 ms 7.9 ms >> 4 init7.sara1.nlsix.net 9.449 ms 9.622 ms 9.616 ms >> 5 2001:1620:2::b1 15.376 ms 9.932 ms 13.515 ms >> 6 r1fra1.core.init7.net 16.314 ms 16.486 ms 16.014 ms >> 7 r1zur2.core.init7.net 28.488 ms 23.977 ms 25.061 ms >> 8 * * * >> ... >> >> You don't seem to have a default route. Are you sure your aiccu is up >> and running ? Make sure your time is correct (run ntpd(8) with at >> least some v4 timeservers), this is important when using aiccu. >> >> | Seems that the route to your network is the problem. >> >> Although I agree with your conclusion ;) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd >> > My gateway is up, for sure. :) It's only pf biting at me. > > ping6 xs6.xs4all.nl > PING xs6.xs4all.nl(xs6.xs4all.nl) 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from xs6.xs4all.nl: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.32 ms > 64 bytes from xs6.xs4all.nl: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.23 ms > > (Mark the low ping times btw, thanks ftth! ;)) > > :)
