Thanks for reviewing.

Is there also an architecture specific bin/error target?

Maybe we need some architecture specific #define for the prefix.

Regards

Heinrich
Am 26.08.18, 23:47, Michael Brown <mc...@ipxe.org> schrieb:
On 26/08/18 11:45, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> diff --git a/src/include/errno.h b/src/include/errno.h
> index e80bf9ca..0294a990 100644
> --- a/src/include/errno.h
> +++ b/src/include/errno.h
> @@ -262,10 +262,10 @@ static inline void eplatform_discard ( int dummy __unused, ... ) {}
> ".align 8\n\t" \
> "\n1:\n\t" \
> ".long ( 4f - 1b )\n\t" \
> - ".long %a0\n\t" \
> + ".long %0\n\t" \
> ".long ( 2f - 1b )\n\t" \
> ".long ( 3f - 1b )\n\t" \
> - ".long %a1\n\t" \
> + ".long %1\n\t" \
> "\n2:\t.asciz \"" __einfo_desc ( einfo ) "\"\n\t" \
> "\n3:\t.asciz \"" __FILE__ "\"\n\t" \
> ".align 8\n\t" \

This patch results in an incorrect assembler _expression_ for the standard
x86 build, e.g.

.long $1216

instead of the needed

.long 1216

You can observe the effects using "make bin/errors" and examining the
resulting file. With your patch, all error numbers and line numbers are
zero.

I'm happy to ditch ARM gcc 4.8 support if it makes it cleaner to support
current versions of gcc, but the patch must still work for the x86 build.

Michael
_______________________________________________
ipxe-devel mailing list
ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org
https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ipxe-devel

Reply via email to