On Fri, 8 May 2020, 04:30 Peter Bartfai, <pbart...@stardust.hu> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Compilation fails on gcc 10.0.1 (Fedora 32). It works with Fedora 31.
>
> [root@fedora src]# make -k bin/undionly.kpxe
>    [BUILD] bin/intelvf.o
> drivers/net/intelvf.c: In function ‘intelvf_mbox_poll’:
> drivers/net/intelvf.c:80:13: error: array subscript i is outside array
> bounds of ‘uint32_t[0]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[]’} [-Werror=array-bounds]
>     80 |   msg->dword[i] = readl ( intel->regs + intel->mbox.mem +
>        |   ~~~~~~~~~~^~~
> In file included from drivers/net/intelvf.c:32:
> drivers/net/intelvf.h:135:11: note: while referencing ‘dword’
>    135 |  uint32_t dword[0];
>        |           ^~~~~
> drivers/net/intelvf.c:98:20: note: defined here ‘msg’
>     98 |  union intelvf_msg msg;
>        |                    ^~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make: *** [Makefile.housekeeping:946: bin/intelvf.o] Error 1
>    [BUILD] bin/flexboot_nodnic.o
> drivers/infiniband/flexboot_nodnic.c: In function
> ‘flexboot_nodnic_create_qp’:
> drivers/infiniband/flexboot_nodnic.c:368:53: error: implicit conversion
> from ‘enum ib_queue_pair_type’ to ‘nodnic_queue_pair_type’
> [-Werror=enum-conversion]
>    368 |  status = nodnic_port_create_qp(&port->port_priv, qp->type,
>        |                                                   ~~^~~~~~
> drivers/infiniband/flexboot_nodnic.c: In function
> ‘flexboot_nodnic_destroy_qp’:
> drivers/infiniband/flexboot_nodnic.c:409:45: error: implicit conversion
> from ‘enum ib_queue_pair_type’ to ‘nodnic_queue_pair_type’
> [-Werror=enum-conversion]
>    409 |  nodnic_port_destroy_qp(&port->port_priv, qp->type,
>        |                                           ~~^~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make: *** [Makefile.housekeeping:946: bin/flexboot_nodnic.o] Error 1
>    [VERSION] bin/version.undionly.kpxe.o
> make: Target 'bin/undionly.kpxe' not remade because of errors.
>
> Please check.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> ipxe-devel mailing list
> ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org
> https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo/ipxe-devel


Did you check the mailinglist for other recent mails about gcc 10?

>
>
_______________________________________________
ipxe-devel mailing list
ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org
https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo/ipxe-devel

Reply via email to