> When it comes to dealing with the cable TV company, all suggestions are > worth consideration.
Now, now. I'm not openly advocating any such thing. Merely passing along an amusing anecdote as to how one chap approached it. (bigwideevilgrin) > Now, do you suppose a ham license would be required for that application of > a transmitter? Since I've already written the FCC, maybe that would cover > it. :-\ One of the good things about equipment is that it requires no license to buy, unlike guns. However, it would take a good number of hundred dollar bills to get the boxes in the door, and then w/o a license, they'd end up as simply closet fodder. <serious mode> I think you've approached this correctly by writing and documenting all this. Having the local government in the loop is smart. The FCC Part 15 regs will have some bearing, as will the original cable authorization contract. It may be hard, but if you can find a copy of that agreement there may be language in there on interference problem resolution. You certainly could hold their feet to the fire with it. </serious mode> Craig Healy Providence, RI _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com