At 11:10 AM 6/22/2008, you wrote: >> > >Got ambitious this morning, and listened from 1145 to 1225UT. More time does >not necessarily equal more DX. > >Most interesting in the "what the DX would be if there was any DX" stakes, was >a fair strength carrier on 1566 before 1200UT, that seemed Asiatic (best on >the northerly Flag)....so HLAZ is still trying to make an appearance pretty >much right at summer solstice. > >The best carrier strengths here were 738 and 1098, with 1475 putting in a >reasonable appearance also. 1386 and 1503 showed signs of life, and there >were a large number of weaker carriers. Managed three (apparently) DU audios: >702 at 1205UT, 792 at 1209UT, and 774 at 1215UT. All were deeply in the >murk, and required a bit of preamplification to be sure these weren't >imaginary. > >Interestingly, sometimes these signals were better on the 1m square ALA100 >copper pipe loop than on the westerly Flag, in spite of not having the Flag's >attenuation off the back end. > >best wishes, > >Nick >
Fellas, I've briefly checked a few channels. Around 11:55, I started to get weak audio on 801, but only briefly. 1098 had a nice strong carrier....sure wish they'd run an overnight feed at least. 1008 looks very promising as well. Some audio at 12:11 there. Sure wish that Perseus wav file playback was more user friendly. As John Bryant pointed out, there are some issues with it making it more difficult to use than it should be (ie compared to the SDR IQ for instance)........Walt. _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
