Mike Hawkins wrote:
I used your reply as a reference here because it addresses two things.
First is that FCC's website has so little information on it that is
accessible outside the FCC that its rather useless. Tracking applications
always results in "major change", "minor change", STA or license. I have
not been able to view an authorization for many moons. There is little if
any correspondence, and legal action is rare.
Two things here:
First, the FCC will soon be abandoning the CDBS database in favor of a
new, more versatile database system that's being billed as having more
direct public access. So much of what I'm about to explain will soon be
obsolete.
That said: there's actually lots of information accessible there. You
just have to know where to look. Here are a few basic tips; I'm happy to
go into greater detail either on- or off-list if there's interest.
I find the quickest way into CDBS is through FCCInfo.com. It's a
privately-operated site, and it's free. The basic searches are right at
the top of the front page: search by callsign, COL, distance from a
given community or set of coordinates, FCC facility ID number, etc.
KTRB offers a good example. Plug those calls into the "callsign" search
box, be sure you've checked the "AM" radio button to the left, and be
sure you've checked the "Include Archive Records" box beneath the callsign.
What comes up is this (watch for word wrap):
http://fccinfo.com/CMDProFacLookup.php?sCurrentService=AM&calls=ktrb&ArchiveRecords=Y&tabSearchType=Call+Sign+Search
There's a lot of chaff here, but also a lot of good information. Ignore
all the "0 kW" power entries for now - they represent FCC records with
no engineering data attached. Ignore anything with a blank space or
"App" in the "Status" column on the left.
What matters to us are actual license records and construction permit
records...and here's what turns up: there's a set of license records for
the old Modesto facility, with 50 kW days and 10 kW nights. We know
that's no longer active, because it shows up as an archived record. Then
we see another set of licenses for the former 50/50 San
Francisco-licensed facility. Those show up as "archive records,"
too...but we can get at the engineering data for those, or for the
Modesto facility, by clicking on the callsign for each entry.
Then we have the current license. Unless the database records are screwy
(and occasionally they are), there should only be one active set of
"license" records for any given station. Click on those and we learn
more about the current KTRB 50/50 facility - location (with a link to a
Google map), tower layout, directional pattern and more.
This page also gives us a link called "Other KTRB Applications," which
returns us to the FCC's own website, to the "Application Search Page"
that can also be accessed directly from the FCC's AM Query:
http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/app_list.pl?Facility_id=66246
This page links us to all the applications that are in CDBS; generally,
that will include at least some information about anything filed after
1978, though detailed electronic applications only exist from the last
decade or so.
If the application was filed electronically (look for the "E" in the
"Paper/Elect" column), you can see it by clicking the "application" list.
Which brings us to the complex system of prefixes the FCC uses for apps.
The ones that matter to us as DXers are BL-, which indicates an AM
station's application for a license, BP-, an application for a
construction permit, BMP-, an app to modify an existing construction
permit, BMJP-, an application for a major modification (change COL,
change frequency more than 30 kHz) and BSTA/BLSTA-, an application for
special temporary authority.
What you get when you click on the application link is the application
itself, which often includes a full engineering narrative that explains
in detail what the application intends to do. A good example is in the
KTRB app to move from Modesto to San Francisco, which appears on the
application list as BMJP-20020910AAB. The first part of the application
consists of a bunch of form entries that are filled out by the
applicant, but the meat is in the attachments. Keep scrolling down to
the section marked "exhibits," and here's your meat - a link marked
"ENGINEERING STATEMENT."
That brings up this:
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_Attachment/getattachment.jsp?appn=100662136&qnum=5110©num=1&exhcnum=1
which in turn tells us this:
"The application appended to this Statement proposes relocation of the
transmitting site of
AM Radio Station KTRB, pursuant to Commission Decision (Reference
1800B3-TSN,
copy attached), which authorizes reassignment of community of license
from Modesto,
California to San Francisco, California.
The transmitting site proposed herein is on Jersey Island within the
delta region of the
San Joaquin River. From this site predicted signal strength over all the
City of San
Francisco will exceed the required level of 5 mV/m day and 11.01 at
night. Separate
directional radiation patterns are proposed for day and night.
As proposed, the day operation will not cause interference to nor
receive interference
from any other existing station or proposals now before the Commission.
Nighttime
operation will not increase interference to any other station beyond
presently existing
values. The interference- free contour from the re- located site is
slightly lower than
interference- free service from the presently licensed KTRB Modesto
operation."
In KTRB's case, the proposal ended up being massively modified before
the station went on the air, so you have to keep reading through a bunch
of modified CPs to learn that the plan changed to dual-site operation
(daytime at Jersey Island/nighttime in the hills above the Sunol Grade),
then to single-site operation at the Sunol site, then back to dual-site
operation with daytime at the KFAX site in Hayward and nighttime at Sunol.
This one is an unusually complex application; most stations have a much
shorter trail of applications, CPs and licenses that's easier to follow.
So...the information is indeed there, if not always in the most
accessible form.
Second is that I asked the question from the perspective of documenting
radio history without any regard for logging of stations. DXers would be
interested in history to varying degrees, but the perspective may be
radically different. The two examples I gave - as well as the one Mike
Sanburn mentioned - really highlight two different perspectives ... the
listener noticing two frequency changes, and the FCC noting two call
changes. Please note that I am not at all dismissing the DXer point of view
(and obviously welcome that point of view since I asked the question here),
but I am trying to consider as many different perspectives as possible...as
long as they hold water.
I'm passionate about documenting radio history, too, of course - and to
that end I'd suggest another really useful resource.
David Gleason has done the radio community a tremendous favor by
acquiring and scanning a nearly complete run of Broadcasting Yearbooks,
White's Logs, RADEXes and much more, which he's sharing with the world -
for free - at americanbroadcastinghistory.com. It's a great way to track
information that predates what's now in CDBS, and I use it constantly.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com