Were they testing, or is it a Daytime thing? I just tried here on the Northern 
OR coast, 110 miles from KFNQ, and I get no IBOC hash. I get a bit on 1080, off 
the SW EWE, but I presume that from KNX, but nothing noted otherwise. KFNQ in 
quite strong here off the NE EWE too. No hash on 1100 either. But at least no 
sign of any hash now. I will try tomorrow during the day. Strange that any new 
IBOCers on AM. Who is listening to IBOC on AM?

73,

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager

> From: rick...@shellworld.net
> To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:33:29 -0700
> Subject: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC
> 
> I may be late to this party, but noticed yesterday that KFNQ-1090 in Seattle 
> is now running IBOC. Not too surprising, since it's owned by CBS.
> Years ago I used to see them on IBOC lists but never heard the slightest 
> hint of hash.
> Now 1080 and 1100 may be history here.
> Noted them with IBOC yesterday.
> I don't often visit that part of the dial, so don't know when they began 
> using it, but it should easily decode on an HD radio here.
> --
> Rick Lewis 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> 
                                          
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Reply via email to