--- Begin Message ---
That definitely sounds to me like a moderately significant improvement in 
signal, Gary, considering it was apparently blank without the nano-FSL or 
whatever you want to call it. :)  (Although on my S-rating system based on my 
perceptions of RST, I'd probably rate that signal as an "S4" - my "S9" is 
usually signals that show 88+ dBµ on the Tecsuns without any external antenna 
boost, and anything over S9 is 95+ dBµ.)
I wonder if there's a chance we may someday have a small and inexpensive enough 
FSL so that you could have it and the Sangean DT-400W or CC Pocket both 
contained in a $100 budget and a package the size of the Skywave or PL-380?  
(I'm thinking the radio would be mounted inside the FSL but with the 
buttons/display somehow still accessible, and instead of being round it'd be 
more rectangular (or oval), but would that not work?)
Also what about an FSL that, instead of being fairly wide relative to its 
diameter, is shaped more like the Select-A-Tenna (or oval) but smaller?
Also I was reading other comments on Yahoo and wondering ...
What's the difference in the various versions of the CC Skywave?
What would happen if you used a 330/46 connection to the radio, but made the 
main coil of the FSL with 1162/46?  (I'm guessing the tedious part would be 
individually soldering each strand of one type to the other, or would a single 
bulk-solder work?)
How does the direct-connected FSL compare with the built-in antenna on adjacent 
and off-channel RSSI, blocking, assuming you're using signals of comparable 
strength?  (Meaning a signal that indicates 89 dBµ on the FSL, and another that 
indicates 89 dBµ on the stock loopstick.)  Does the FSL have higher Q, and not 
block stations as much as the stock stick?
Also, Skywave vs Traveler 3 - which do you think I may potentially be happier 
with on AM and FM for the price?  Fry's has the Skywave here but they want $70 
for it and I think that's too much for that model.  I had one briefly but the 
display is terrible outdoors in bright light, also I had some other issues with 
it too.  (Some of my complaints with the PL-380 were improved, though.)
73, Stephen 

    On Saturday, December 19, 2015 6:43 AM, "d1028g...@comcast.net" 
<d1028g...@comcast.net> wrote:
 

 Hello All, 
  
The new-design 3.7" FSL is one of several experimental models being tested in 
an effort to design low cost, high performing models for the MW-DXing 
community. The 3.7 inch FSL is of a very tiny size (a photo is posted at 
https://app.box.com/s/e8pv0rh2ydoeyu6rjqewjc8yq3dsd2kr  ), but it uses the 
highest sensitivity Litz wire available on the commercial market (1162/46). 
This is the same high-sensitivity Litz wire used in the monster FSL models on 
Oregon cliff DXpeditions. The 3.7" Baby FSL is designed to be constructed for 
under $100 in parts, but it packs a very powerful performance punch in its tiny 
size. 
  
After completion of the first test model this morning the antenna was tested 
out in the reception of 1566-HLAZ at 1507, and received this Japanese service 
signal at an S9+ level on the CC Skywave (as shown in the photo linked above). 
Without the FSL antenna boost the Ultralight radio had no reception of HLAZ at 
all. 
  
  https://app.box.com/s/8e2c7wuiw8tldq3ov9f3etqrw0jdzjxw 
  
73 and Good DX, 
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
7.5" loopstick CC Skywave Ultralight + 
3.7 inch "Baby FSL" 
  
  
  
  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com



  

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Reply via email to