Thanks Nick, The wimpy signal from 1070-CFAX to the SE is actually a boon for fanatical antenna experimenters 100 miles away :-) It has provided a nice, ghostlike daytime DX signal for all kinds of bizarre A/B antenna tests for over 8 years. Some of the daytime DX signals from BC (like 730 and 1130) are way too strong to be of any use in antenna testing. CFAX is just barely there-- wimpy enough to be an ideal target! 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <n...@ieee.org> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@hard-core-dx.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 7:23:49 AM Subject: Re: [IRCA] "Star Wars" Shootout-- Sony ICF-S5 "Superstar" Vs. "Science Fiction PL-380" We should work out how much of CFAX's 10 kw goes in your direction Gary. It's highly directional away from you, so is much better daytime DX than the power rating sounds like. best wishes, Nick > > On Feb 27, 2016, at 8:20 PM, d1028g...@comcast.net wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > The Sony ICF-S5 classic portable from 1980 has the reputation of > being one of the most sensitive AM-DXing portables ever > manufactured. Roughly equivalent in sensitivity to the Panasonic > RF-2200, it was the Japanese-market equivalent of the legendary > ICF-S5W portable-- which usually commands hundreds of dollars > during the rare occasions when it is offered on eBay. Back in 1980, > the ICF-S5 was marketed in Japan by Sony with the nickname of "The > Superstar." > > > > The all-new 3" Bar FSL Tecsun PL-380 model has its own advantage, > however-- a transplanted FSL antenna enhancing its own AM > sensitivity up to a phenomenal level. Of course it also has DSP > selectivity, 500 memories, multiple digital search functions and > other 21st century refinements-- but such concepts were only > "wishful thinking" back in 1980. > > > > See how these two awesome AM-DXing portables shake out in the > daytime DX reception of 1070-CFAX (10 kW at 99 miles) in the new > video posted at > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY9u8MReGjk&feature=youtu.be . The > link for the "Heathkit-like" full construction article is also included. > > > > 73 and Good DX, > > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IRCA mailing list > > IRCA@hard-core-dx.com > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > > > To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com > > > >_______________________________________________ >IRCA mailing list >IRCA@hard-core-dx.com >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
