Let's say I have these interfaces
public interface IWeapon{
void Attack(IWarrior warrior);
int Damage();
}
public interface IWarrior
{
int Id { get; }
string Name { get; set; }
bool IsKilledBy(IWeapon weapon);
void Attack(IWarrior target, IWeapon weapon);
}
And one implementor defined in C#
public class Ninja : IWarrior{
private readonly int _id;
public string Name { get; set; }
public int Id { get { return _id; } }
public void Attack(IWarrior target, IWeapon weapon){
weapon.Attack(target);
}
public bool IsKilledBy(IWeapon weapon)
{
return weapon.Damage() > 3;
}
}
Now if I create an implementation of IWeapon in Ruby
class Shuriken
include IWeapon
def damage
2
end
end
which I then proceed to wrap in a forwarding class
class ShurikenProxy
instance_methods.each do |name|
undef_method name unless name =~ /^__|^instance_eval$/
end
def initialize
@subject = Shuriken.new
end
def method_missing(m, *a, &b) @subject.send(m, *a, &b)
end
end
Then I would expect this to work:
ninja = Ninja.new
ninja.is_killed_by ShurikenProxy.new
only it tells me that the ruby object isn't an implementation of IWeapon
while by all ruby standards it is. if you ask it for its ancestors it's got
IWeapon there
if you ask it for its class it tells you Shuriken and not ShurikenProxy
Is that supposed to happen?
---
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
Ivan Porto Carrero
Blog: http://flanders.co.nz
Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim
Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero)
Emma Goldman <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/e/emma_goldman.html>
- "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal."
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
