Don't rush at finishing it just because of me. Specially because the managed part of our CWT is doing linear search instead of been a hashtable. I'm halfway thru implementing it and it would be awesome to have it done since most of my tests are artificial.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Tomas Matousek <[email protected] > wrote: > Yes, it should be easy to switch over to CWT. I can look at doing so > tomorrow if it helps you. > > > > Tomas > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rodrigo Kumpera > *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:34 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby usage of ConditionalWeakTable > > > > That's pretty odd given that there is code to transparently use CWT instead > of Dictionary<WR, object>. > > > > I was hoping for to use IR to benchmark my current implementation of CWT on > mono. :( > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tomas Matousek < > [email protected]> wrote: > > No, IronRuby still uses a custom weak table, which doesn’t work properly in > all scenarios. > > > > Tomas > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rodrigo Kumpera > *Sent:* Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:44 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Ironruby-core] IronRuby usage of ConditionalWeakTable > > > > Hey folks, > > > > I downloaded DLR from dlr.codeplex.com a few days ago and IR was not > properly using CWT to store properties on CLR objects. > > > > Has this been fixed? > > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
