On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 03:44:24AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > been a _lot_ easier (as well as faster and less memory intensive). And > since I already have most of the required library code written, there's > not much need to use GLIB anyway :)
Is it (your library) portable? Can it be used on Win32? To be honest, I really dislike glib, and I like when there are no external dependencies exists (except for standard C library and anything else which works well on Win32 as good as on *ix) :) > but I also think that irssi should be fully functioning for most people > without external scripting language. Unless there will be some embedded scripting language :) I think this idea is not bad - make everything which needs optimization in C, but everything else in interpreted language - this will help to avoid a lot of problems related to buffer overflows etc. Regards, /Al
