> Nonetheless, we still have the real-based Library.random from "ML for > the working programmer", because without it quickcheck performs really > bad.
AFAIR this has only been the case for the ancient SML quickcheck,
whereas my quickcheck implementation comes with a random generator in
HOL based on a cousin in Haskell. If this is true, we could throw away
Library.random. Maybe Lukas can comment on this.
Florian
--
Home:
http://www.in.tum.de/~haftmann
PGP available:
http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
