Hi Clemens, hi Makarius, let me continue concerning syntax:
The current syntax in Tools/interpretation_with_defs.ML is just a proof of concept: interpretation L inst where "bar = t" defines f is foo A much better idea could be to give the new defs in a for-clause: interpretation L inst for f :: T where "foo = f" "bar = t" where the implicit definitions (f) are mentioned in the for-clause. One could also think about hiding away the full generality of a) from the user (for which there might be good reasons) and have something like interpretation L inst for f :: T where f is foo t is bar Or the where clause could be integrated completely into the locale expression using named syntax: interpretation L (| f := foo, t := bar |) for f :: T Cheers, Florian -- PGP available: http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev