I used to look at veiled women as quiet,
oppressed creatures -- until I was captured by the Taliban. In
September 2001, just 15 days after the terrorist attacks on the
United States , I snuck into Afghanistan , clad in a head-to-toe blue
burqa, intending to write a newspaper account of life under the repressive
regime. Instead, I was discovered, arrested and detained for 10 days. I
spat and swore at my captors; they called me a "bad" woman but let me go
after I promised to read the Koran and study Islam. (Frankly, I'm not sure
who was happier when I was freed -- they or I.)
Back home in London , I kept my word about studying
Islam -- and was amazed by what I discovered. I'd been expecting Koran
chapters on how to beat your wife and oppress your daughters; instead, I
found passages promoting the liberation of women. Two-and-a-half years
after my capture, I converted to Islam, provoking a mixture of
astonishment, disappointment and encouragement among friends and
relatives. Now, it is with disgust and dismay that I watch here in
Britain as former foreign secretary Jack Straw describes the Muslim nikab
-- a face veil that reveals only the eyes -- as an unwelcome barrier to
integration, with Prime Minister Tony Blair, writer Salman Rushdie and
even Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi leaping to his defense. Having
been on both sides of the veil, I can tell you that most Western male
politicians and journalists who lament the oppression of women in the
Islamic world have no idea what they are talking about. They go on about
veils, child brides, female circumcision, honor killings and forced
marriages, and they wrongly blame Islam for all this -- their arrogance
surpassed only by their ignorance. These cultural issues and customs
have nothing to do with Islam. A careful reading of
the Koran shows that just about everything that Western feminists fought
for in the 1970s was available to Muslim women 1,400 years ago. Women in
Islam are considered equal to men in spirituality, education and worth,
and a woman's gift for childbirth and child-rearing is regarded as a
positive attribute. When Islam offers women so much, why are
Western men so obsessed with Muslim women's attire? Even British
government ministers Gordon Brown and John Reid have made disparaging
remarks about the nikab -- and they hail from across the Scottish border,
where men wear skirts. When I converted to Islam and began wearing a
headscarf, the repercussions were enormous. All I did was cover my head
and hair -- but I instantly became a second-class citizen. I knew I'd hear
from the odd Islamophobe, but I didn't expect so much open hostility from
strangers. Cabs passed me by at night, their "for hire" lights glowing.
One cabbie, after dropping off a white passenger right in front of me,
glared at me when I rapped on his window, then drove off. Another said,
"Don't leave a bomb in the back seat" and asked, "Where's bin Laden
hiding?" Yes, it is a religious obligation for Muslim women to dress
modestly, but the majority of Muslim women I know like wearing the hijab,
which leaves the face uncovered, though a few prefer the nikab. It is a
personal statement: My dress tells you that I am a Muslim and that I
expect to be treated respectfully, much as a Wall Street banker would say
that a business suit defines him as an executive to be taken seriously.
And, especially among converts to the faith like me, the attention of men
who confront women with inappropriate, leering behavior is not
tolerable. I was a Western feminist for many years, but I've discovered
that Muslim feminists are more radical than their secular counterparts. We
hate those ghastly beauty pageants, and tried to stop laughing in 2003
when judges of the Miss Earth competition hailed the emergence of a
bikini-clad Miss Afghanistan , Vida Samadzai, as a giant leap for women's
liberation. They even gave Samadzai a special award for "representing the
victory of women's rights." Some young Muslim feminists consider the hijab and the nikab
political symbols, too, a way of rejecting Western excesses such as binge
drinking, casual sex and drug use. What is more liberating: being judged
on the length of your skirt and the size of your surgically enhanced
breasts, or being judged on your character and intelligence? In Islam,
superiority is achieved through piety -- not beauty, wealth, power,
position or sex. I didn't know whether to scream or laugh
when Italy's Prodi joined the debate last week by declaring that it is
"common sense" not to wear the nikab because it
makes social relations "more difficult." Nonsense. If this is the case, then why are cellphones,
landlines, e-mail, text messaging and fax machines in daily use? And no
one switches off the radio because they can't see the presenter's
face. Under Islam, I am respected. It tells
me that I have a right to an education and that it is my duty to seek out
knowledge, regardless of whether I am single or married. Nowhere in the
framework of Islam are we told that women must wash, clean or cook for
men. As for how Muslim men are allowed to beat their wives -- it's
simply not true. Critics of Islam will quote random Koranic verses or
hadith, but usually out of context. If a man does raise a finger against
his wife, he is not allowed to leave a mark on her body, which is the
Koran's way of saying, "Don't beat your wife, stupid." It is not just
Muslim men who must reevaluate the place and treatment of women. According
to a recent National Domestic Violence Hotline survey, 4 million American
women experience a serious assault by a partner during an average 12-month
period. More than three women are killed by their husbands and boyfriends
every day -- that is nearly 5,500 since 9/11. Violent men don't come
from any particular religious or cultural category; one in three women
around the world has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused in
her lifetime, according to the hotline survey. This is a global problem
that transcends religion, wealth, class, race and culture. But it is
also true that in the West, men still believe that they are superior to
women, despite protests to the contrary. They still receive better pay for
equal work -- whether in the mailroom or the boardroom -- and women are
still treated as sexualized commodities whose power and influence flow
directly from their appearance. And for those who are still trying to
claim that Islam oppresses women, recall this 1992 statement from the Rev.
Pat Robertson, offering his views on empowered women: Feminism is a
"socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave
their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy
capitalism and become lesbians." Now you tell me who is civilized and
who is not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]comYvonne Ridley is political editor of Islam Channel TV in London and
coauthor of "In the Hands of the Taliban: Her Extraordinary Story"
(Robson Books).
|