by INGRID MATTSON

Muslims in America today seem to have lost the right to be individuals. We are 
treated as a collectivity - responsible as a group for any crime committed by 
another Muslim or done in the name of Islam. 

Shortly after 9/11, I wrote an article stating that Muslims have the greatest 
obligation to reject terrorism and political violence committed in the name of 
Islam. I still believe this is the case. Islam does not have a centralized 
authority; there is no universally recognized council of scholars or clerics 
who speak on behalf of all Muslims. 

With freedom from clerical authority, however, comes the responsibility to 
engage in the debate over the true meaning of Islam. Islamic law states that 
silence is an indication of consent. If Muslims do not reject the perverted 
interpretations of the Qur'an proffered by terrorists, they will have shirked 
their responsibility to define the real meaning of Islam. 

At the same time, clarifying our own position does not mean that we have to 
"speak out" against each and every statement issued by terrorists or every 
criminal action taken by groups claiming to represent Muslim interests. Once we 
have defined what we stand for, and what we stand against, then any particular 
action that violates those guidelines are clearly rejected by us. American 
Muslim organizations have made extraordinary efforts to publicize their 
rejection of terrorism and extremism in the name of Islam: we have organized 
petitions, written fatwas and position papers, distributed brochures, held 
conferences, organized press briefings, published op-eds, spoken on the radio 
and television. 

Still, we are asked, "Why have moderate Muslims not spoken out against the 
extremists?" We have spoken, but we have not been heard-primarily because good 
news does not get much coverage.

Even worse, we have spoken, but we have not been listened to. There are many 
people who are ideologically opposed to Islam-to the most benign interpretation 
of Islam-because of their own extremist religious or political ideologies. No 
matter what conscientious Muslims do to live as peaceful citizens who 
contribute to the welfare of society, these groups will attack us and our 
religion. 

Most objectionable is what I call the, "non-Muslim Islamic fundamentalist." 
What I mean by this is a non-Muslim who applies a literalistic, 
decontextualized hermeneutic to the Qur'an and Islamic tradition. This is not 
how I read my scripture (maybe it is how they read theirs), so who are they to 
tell me that this is what Islam "really" says? 

Being judged as a group, rather than as individuals, also means that the 
negative experience of one Muslim is considered to be representative of all 
Muslims and all of Islam. I do not deny the right of any individual to tell his 
or her own story. We all have that right, and I must learn from the pain, hurt 
and anger of women and men who were mistreated in the name of Islam. 

But these negative experiences are not shared by all Muslims - indeed, not by 
most Muslims. This is why such authors have little or no constituencies within 
the Muslim community - because large numbers of Muslims do not feel they 
represent their interests or perspectives. 

The burden of collective guilt, the oppressive weight of stereotyping, and the 
violence of hateful anti-Muslim discourse is difficult to bear. It is even more 
difficult to see how this affects our youth.

But there is hope. Hope lies in the goodness of ordinary Americans who try to 
overcome their prejudices and reach out to their Muslim neighbors. Hope lies in 
the solidarity shown by other groups - like Japanese Americans - who have faced 
similar situations. Hope lies in the extraordinary moral leadership shown by 
many American religious leaders to guide their congregations to the path of 
understanding and compassion. 

More than anything, I see these challenges as opportunities to examine myself 
and my community, to see if we are responding with enough courage and moral 
leadership when we witness discrimination against others. Are we able to avoid 
burdening other groups with collective guilt? The Qur'anic revelation, "no soul 
bears the sins of another" is directed first at our community. We are all 
human, and all of us have to struggle with our own selfishness, prejudice and 
will to power. 

As a Muslim, my struggle for my community's rights should be only the starting 
point of a wider struggle - a struggle for the dignity of all people. Being a 
Muslim in America today means having the opportunity to work towards this goal 
in solidarity with compassionate individuals of all faiths and good will. 

DR. INGRID MATTSON is an "On Faith" panelist and professor of Islamic Studies 
and Christian-Muslim Relations at Hartford Seminary. She is the first woman to 
be president of the Islamic Society of North America. 


saiyed shahbazi
  www.shahbazcenter.org

Reply via email to