Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaah respects the family of the Prophet (sallallaahu 'alaihi 
wasallam) and also the companions of the Prophet.Unfortunately, shia have gone 
extreme in the religion by taking the family of Prophet as intermediaries, and 
by abusing the companions of the Prophet such as Umar and Abu Bakr(may Peace be 
upon them). Dr. Zakir Naik says what the scholars of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal 
Jamaah say. If you are criticizing Dr. Zakir Naik, then you are also 
criticizing the stand of the Ahlus sunnsh wal Jamaah.visit www.islam-qa.com on 
issues relating to the deviance of the shia.On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:55:31 -0800 
(PST) islamcity@yahoogroups.com wroteMr. Shafi wrote"However, Islam is a name 
of Quran o Hadith, "Either we accept his statement or not in both cases he has 
to defend his faith.A) Suppose Quran & Hadith is Islam though its not 
supported by Nas-e-Quran, which is Quran & Prophet's Sunnah.Shia & 
Sunni unanimously agreed that theres no hadith is as authentic,as Mutawatir, as 
consistent as Hadith-e-Thaqalain--Only Shia & majority of sunni found this 
hadith as binding as consistent it is.Prophet saysI am leaving behind Quran 
& Ahlul-Baith stick with them--Hadith does not end here--It 
continues--Until they reach me at Hoz-e-Kausar.So Quran & Ahlul Baith are 
inseperable until the judgment day--Its possible Zakir Naik preach Tauheed in 
his style & convert few hindus but it does not give him certificate of 
Sirat-e-Mustaqeem.Islam isnothing but obedience to Allah & obedience to 
Prophet(saw) because of obedience to Prophet as per His command obedience to 
Ahlul Baith is also Islam & essential part of Eiman.Zakir Naik could never 
be bigger Maowwahid than Shaitan Iblees but he digressed as Shaitan when he 
thought he knew better than Allah how to worship Him.Worship means nothing but 
obedience--disregarding ahlul baith is as bad deviation as that of Shaitan.--- 
On Sat, 2/14/09, muham...@yahoo.com wrote:From: muham...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: 
Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.To: "eGroup For 
Muslims Around The World" Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 2:35 AMDear All 
concerned. There is no Wahabism Islam in the World.  A man with the 
name of Muhammad Bib Abdul Wahab who is follower of Mazhab of Imam Ahmed 
Bin Hamble (RA).  Imam AhmedBib Hamble (Hambly Mazhab) is one out of 
four Mazhabs.  It is said that these fourMazhabs are on Haq.  
Even then some persons having no knowledge of Islam do not hesitate to 
blame the Mazhab of Imam Ahmed Bin Hamble (RA).  When we say that these 
four Mazhabs came into existance more than 100 years  after the 
completion of Islam, and are not on the right path, even then some says 
that these four Mazhabs are on the right path.  This is the admission of 
those people who blame Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab (Hambly Mazhab) as on 
right path and on the other handthese people blame Hambly Mazhab as on the 
wrong path.  However, Islam is a name of Quran o Hadith, the 
follower of these two books are also consideredWahabi by Qabar Parast 
group.   Even I have seen some non-sense people who are 
basically from Mazhab Hanfi declare to the follower of Hanfi Mazhab as 
Wahabi.  They have no sense of Islam. Mr. Zakir Naik from India is a 
great schollar of Islam.  He has won so many Munazras withghair 
Muslims.   He is true follower of Islam.  I have seen on 
Internet that so many Hindus and other people have converted / accepted Islam 
with his struggle and knowledge. May Allah give him more courage to spread 
true Islam in the continent.  Please do not hear / take care of such mails 
which are spread to defame schollare of Islam. Thanks. Shafi --- 
On Tue, 10/2/09, sai...@yahoo. com wrote:From: sai...@yahoo. com Subject: 
Bismillah [IslamCity] Dr. Zakir Naik - Defame And Destroy.To: "eGroup For 
Muslims Around The World" Date: Tuesday, 10 February, 2009, 4:33 AMDr. Zakir 
Naik - Defame And Destroy.Jamshed IqbalOne comes across several interesting 
comments from the people who have been defending Mr. Zakir Naik on Indian 
Muslims Blog. Most of my brothers and sisters are impressed by his “immense 
knowledge” without knowing that his kind of knowledge (database or retention) 
has nothing to do with religion at all. In other words the knowledge he and his 
fans boast of is irreligious in its very essence, for any true religion is an 
ever-flowing fountain of “wisdom” not “knowledge”.However, Mr. Naik is not an 
only man basking under this false impression but, it is pity that most of our 
so-called Muslim scholars are making the profits of same deceptive notion. And 
it is about this “subtle subversion” that Muslim world or Muslim identity has 
suffered a great deal. Therefore in this article, I would talk about a whole 
range of “scholars” of this nature and use the name of Mr. Naik as an 
“all-purpose unit” to bring my point home.A wise man may have some knowledge 
but “it does not necessitate that every knowledgeable man is wise”. For 
knowledge comes with analysis but wisdom with synthesis. Analysis demands 
scattering the whole into parts and pieces, on the contrary, synthesis demands 
uniting and reassembling the parts, once again, into a whole.Men of knowledge 
without wisdom are far more harmful for human family than mad men. For 
knowledge without wisdom lacks comprehensiveness of vision, feelings, beauty 
and empathy. Therefore it is not beneficial at all, and in religious terms, it 
is irreligious! How?A man of knowledge studies the composition of the atom from 
a disinterested desire for knowledge, and incidentally places it in the hands 
of powerful lunatics as the means of destroying the human race.In such ways the 
pursuit of knowledge may become harmful unless it is combined with wisdom; and 
wisdom in the sense of comprehensive vision is not necessarily present in 
specialists in the pursuit of any kind of knowledge.The point is “so-called men 
of knowledge lack comprehensive vision that is necessary to make them wise”. 
Ask, for example, a man of science to define human being! If he is sociologist 
he will tell you that, “man is a social animal for he cannot live without 
society”. Ask the same question to a physicist and he would brief you about 
“material composition of a human being” and reduce it to material hump. Raise 
this question before a chemist and get ready to listen that “man is nothing but 
product or composition of different chemicals”. A chemist would also open your 
eyes by telling that “man is a chemical animal and his emotions and character 
is mainly controlled by chemical balance or imbalance”. Go to a biologist to 
listen, “human being is an organism composed of different organs”. See a human 
being have been dissected into piece and lost! Even if all of these definitions 
cannot include what makes a human being a humanbeing!Definitions, I mean to 
say, are the foundations of analytical thinking and they always fail to spot 
the core—the essence. For example, in above definition of human person, what 
makes human person a human person is nowhere, as no definition could be 
holistic! Moreover, in definition, metaphor or simile, as logic demands, is not 
allowed to make analytical thinking free from feelings but religious wisdom or 
morality is absurd or impossible without feelings! There is no room for 
aesthetics (beauty) in analysis and morality or wisdom gushes from these two 
springs as well!I think Islam is very clear about this point as:“Allah is 
beautiful and loves beauty”. Allah (The Supreme Reality) is truth and truth 
cannot be revealed unto those whose whole effort is demystification and 
dissection!Has analysis anything to do with “love”? Isn’t beauty a mystery so 
beyond the logic (Allah Him/Herself) ? Have analytical sciences, from so-called 
Enlightenment Age onwards, not been trying to demystify the mysterious 
phenomenon of existence or being? Was it not an organized effort to obliterate 
God from human consciousness? Has sciences (knowledge not wisdom) not been 
consciously trying to omit suggestiveness from natural phenomena to make it 
dull and ugly!There have a tendency among Quranic scholars—the tendency to 
count! For example word (or Ism-e-Zat) Allah has been used so many times in 
Quran. Mr. Zakir Naik, and others of course, can safely claim 10 GB memory 
containing these types of calculations. But, so far as I know, no one has told 
that how many similes and metaphors are used in Quran. How many attributes of 
Allah (the beneficent the merciful) reflect rationality and others feelings or 
emotions?Mr. Zakir Naik could not deny that Prophet Mohammad’s (May peace by 
upon him) holy life is an evergreen epic of compassion and empathy—the gift “to 
feel” with others! Remember once my Lord was running for milking the sheep to 
feed a crying cat when West was not familiar with “animal rights”! Was it 
analysis or feeling—feeling with and for the whole creation?Islam is known to 
be the highest point of Abrahamic tradition and Prophet Abraham dived into the 
fire! A rationalist or an analyst (or a man of knowledge) would never think 
that fire could behave otherwise!In short the whole range of knowledge mounted 
up by sciences is of analytical nature, and therefore today, world is rich with 
knowledge but poor in wisdom. For if it were rich in wisdom we would have been 
living in paradise! The main problem with our age is that our age far surpasses 
all previous ages in knowledge (rotted data) but there is a correlative 
“famine” of wisdom. Since wisdom includes not only intellect but also feelings, 
and this world is mostly steered by those whose knowledge is wide but feelings 
are too narrow! Therefore they have made it a hell of hatred!One of my 
brothers, Mr. Wasif, wrote about Zakir Naik’s comments about Sufi saints. 
According to him Zakir Naik says:“Sufism is an alien plant in the soil of 
Islam”These are actually the words of Allama Mohammad Iqbal (1877-1938) who, no 
doubt, was an extraordinarily profound and inspiring poet—but as a philosopher, 
he used to wear several hats of intellect like Herbert Spencer in Western 
philosophical tradition. Actually, as I think, his poetry and thought begins in 
trivial metaphors, pretty metaphors, then culminates into “grace metaphors” and 
finally goes on to profoundest thinking that we have. Mr. Zakir Naik should 
note that in his profundity—Iqbal himself is a Sufi! For example:Ik 
Danish-e-burhani, ik Danish-e-ruhaniHai Danish-e-burhani hairat ki frawani(One 
the one hand there is an argumentative/ logical wisdom, and, on the other hand 
spiritual wisdom! But argumentative/ logical wisdom is nothing but surplus of 
wonder…….)Qadhe khirad froze keh Frang dad maraHama aftab lekin asar-e-sahar na 
darid(The shining wine cup of rationality offered by the West is the full Sun 
but powerless/impotent to bring into being lime light of the morning)Iqbal used 
to call himself a disciple (mureed hindi) of Jalal-ud-Din Rumi—the great 
Persian Sufi poet! Therefore, he was highly impressed by Persian influence on 
Islamic culture, community and thought. For example, in his famous chapter, The 
Muslim Community, in The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam, Iqbal 
writes:“The conquest of Persia gave to the Musalmans what the conquest of 
Greece gave to the Romans. But for Persian, our culture would have been 
absolutely one sided”.It is doubtless that Mr. Zakir Naik is advocating and 
pushing exclusively soulless, fanatical and chauvinistic Saudi (Wahhabi) 
version of Islam that has become a disgusting scar on the face of highly 
inclusive Islamic teachings! It is duty of Wahabism to wage war against 
teachings of great Sufi saints who kept the divinely prophet-consciousne ss 
alive not by preaching the truth but living like truth! Naik’s grudge towards 
Hussain (may Allah be pleased with him) is a clear sign that he is an agent of 
un-Islamic Saudi state employed to save her from Hussain who exposes and 
challenges Yazid of every age!Wahhabism is troubled by Sufism for it is a 
message of inclusiveness and tolerance! Wahhabism wages war against it for it 
is a message of freedom and core of Islam that is, in its essence anti- 
hierarchy and anti-establishment! Wahhabism is afraid of Sufism for it shows a 
beautiful face of Islam but Saudi’s allies (especially United States) are 
funding her to prove it ugly and dangerous for peaceful coexistence!Mr. Zakir 
Naik and all his friends are stakeholders in the highly lucrative and hideous 
business of a great conspiracy “Defame & Destroy”. For it is duty of 
Wahhabism to promote blameful and reproachably bigoted religiosity for 
facilitating its funders to wipe Muslims from the face of the earth by 
declaring them potentially dangerous creatures!May Allah save my innocent 
brothers and sisters in Islam from felling a prey to a vicious alliance! May 
Allah help us to show our non-Muslim brothers and sisters that Wahhabism is not 
the real face of Islam! Islam is one of the most inclusive religions wherein 
“ink of a scholar is holier than blood of a martyr” and “killing one human 
person is killing humanity”! Islam—that is a religion of heart, love, empathy 
and compassion!Amen!Jamshed Iqbal is a student and teacher of English 
literature and philosophysaiyed shahbaziwww.shahbazcenter. orgGet your 
preferred Email name! Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail. com.

Reply via email to