|
Ateeq:
I agree with all your points. However, what you are suggesting is a
modification of the product feature which is called "Shared Port". I guess
we need to take up these modification separately with PTCL. SOP only discusses
how to resolve any issue or problem and who will be coordinating on behalf
of PTCL for the provisioning of new circuit.
Regards,
Jamal
"Ateeq.M.Khan" wrote:
Dear
Jamal, I refer to the
point 2.1 Shared bandwidth through ITI: Now
to be fair with all, the shared bandwidth pricing,delivery mechanism has
to be justified : 1.
The sharing formula should be 1:2 i.e. 50%. One third is difficult to guage
and also at times could be problematic..you know digital science is based
on power of 2 hence odd numbers(3,5,7,9...is it odd or even i never remember
correctly) gives uneasy feeling
Agreed.
2. Feature of atleast 50% (if
not 100% ) burst should be there to compensate for the extra cost against
clean pipe of that value. For example if I get 512 Kbps clean for USD 5.3
K and shared 2 MB with 1/3 formula comes out around 683 Kbps costs USD
7.2K then obviuosly it is of no value to have 2Mb shared if it is to be
FIXED at that level without burst feature
Definitely.
3. Roughly shared 2 Mbps (USD
7.2 K) cost half of full pipe of 2 Mb (USD 15K) hence as term level
playing field implies that we should have a CIR of 50% of clean for this
price. The extra benefit or risk is the burst of remaining 50%
I agree.
4. I know some of the guys are
coming from the top and pressurizing to stop shared bandwidth... so wisdom
demands that in house consensus be built before we try out our muscles
at PTCL levels Expecting
your reply asap. RegardsAteeq
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:59
AM
Subject: ISPAK: SOP STM-1
Mr.Jamal Nasir
Khan,All
other members ISPAK. AoA,Please
find attached a proposed draft of SOP for STM-1 being adopted by PTCLKindly
review it and send your feed back , amendments or suggestions
to modify it for final preparation within two days to Mr.Jamal Nasir Khan
Chairman ,Technical Committee ISPAK . Best
regards,Sanaullah
Bhutta,
|
begin:vcard
n:Khan;Jamal Nasir Khan
tel;cell:92-320-4236688
tel;fax:92-21-5871869
tel;work:92-21-5871864-7
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;-4432
fn:Jamal Nasir Khan
end:vcard
