[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17033265#comment-17033265
]
Aman Sinha commented on IMPALA-9351:
------------------------------------
This same error occurred again in last nights build of cdpd-master. It does
seem intermittent but interestingly each time this has occurred it fails for
this particular file path:
{noformat}
AnalyzesOk("create table if not exists newtbl_DNE like orc " +
"'/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0'");{noformat}
I notice that this is the only test in the whole file that is accessing the
functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat path. Is there anything special
about this file path ?
> AnalyzeDDLTest.TestCreateTableLikeFileOrc failed due to non-existing path
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-9351
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-9351
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Frontend
> Reporter: Fang-Yu Rao
> Assignee: Norbert Luksa
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: broken-build, flaky-test
>
> AnalyzeDDLTest.TestCreateTableLikeFileOrc failed due to a non-existing path.
> Specifically, we see the following error message.
> {code:java}
> Error Message
> Error during analysis:
> org.apache.impala.common.AnalysisException: Cannot infer schema, path does
> not exist:
> hdfs://localhost:20500/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0
> sql:
> create table if not exists newtbl_DNE like orc
> '/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0'
> {code}
> The stack trace is provided in the following.
> {code:java}
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> Error during analysis:
> org.apache.impala.common.AnalysisException: Cannot infer schema, path does
> not exist:
> hdfs://localhost:20500/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0
> sql:
> create table if not exists newtbl_DNE like orc
> '/test-warehouse/functional_orc_def.db/complextypes_fileformat/000000_0'
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at
> org.apache.impala.common.FrontendFixture.analyzeStmt(FrontendFixture.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.impala.common.FrontendTestBase.AnalyzesOk(FrontendTestBase.java:244)
> at
> org.apache.impala.common.FrontendTestBase.AnalyzesOk(FrontendTestBase.java:185)
> at
> org.apache.impala.analysis.AnalyzeDDLTest.TestCreateTableLikeFileOrc(AnalyzeDDLTest.java:2045)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:272)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:236)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:386)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:323)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:143)
> {code}
> This test was recently added by [~norbertluksa], and [~boroknagyz] gave a +2,
> maybe [~boroknagyz] could provide some insight into this? Thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscr...@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-h...@impala.apache.org
