[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-13197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17955822#comment-17955822
]
weihua zhang edited comment on IMPALA-13197 at 6/3/25 8:09 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
if we use calcite rule *PROJECT_TO_LOGICAL_PROJECT_AND_WINDOW* , maybe can
simplify the logic of {*}Implement analytic functions{*}?
in this way, maybe we can easily implement rule for
[IMPALA-14115|http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-14115]. and I think
use this methods, we can reduce the difference between calcite
and then do not use AnalyticPlanner in calcite fe.
was (Author: JIRAUSER307426):
if we use calcite rule *PROJECT_TO_LOGICAL_PROJECT_AND_WINDOW* , maybe can
simplify the logic of {*}Implement analytic functions{*}?
but we need to handle Calc operator if we use
PROJECT_TO_LOGICAL_PROJECT_AND_WINDOW
in this way, maybe we can easily implement rule for
[IMPALA-14115|http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-14115]. and I think
use this methods, we can reduce the difference between calcite
and then do not use AnalyticPlanner in calcite fe.
> Implement analytic functions
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-13197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-13197
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Steve Carlin
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Impala 4.5.0
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscr...@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-h...@impala.apache.org
