[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dumitru HUSLEAG updated AMQ-6062:
---------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: I already attached a JMeter test plan that injects messages in 2 queues 
and after that starts calling browse in 2 threads.
You just have to adapt the paths to your ActiveMQ.)

> Broker goes 100% CPU on multi-queue command line browse
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-6062
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6062
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.9.1, 5.12.0
>         Environment: Linux Ubuntu, Aix, with both Java 6 and Java 7 (either 
> IBM or Oracle)
>            Reporter: Dumitru HUSLEAG
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: ActiveMQ_BrowseInfiniteLoopUseCase.jmx, 
> ThreadStatusAnalysis_2015-11-25_14h13m33s.png
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Hello,
> The Broker may enter a state of high CPU consumption (100% or 200% if 2 
> browse enter the infinite loop in the same time on a multi-core) when a 
> command line browse on multiple queues is issued. When that arrives the only 
> way we found to restore the situation was to kill the broker and restart 
> because he was not responding anymore to clients. Killing the clients and the 
> browse process does not lower the CPU usage of the broker.
> I assume the infinite loop based on successive thread dumps that show the 
> browse thread remaines in the same code zone:
> Here is an example of the Browse thread call stack trace, when Broker is in 
> high CPU usage state:
> {quote}
> at java/util/HashMap.rehash(HashMap.java:782(Compiled Code))
> at java/util/HashMap.rehash(HashMap.java:819(Compiled Code))
> at java/util/HashMap.putImpl(HashMap.java:702(Compiled Code))
> at java/util/HashMap.put(HashMap.java:680(Compiled Code))
> at 
> org/apache/activemq/broker/region/*QueueBrowserSubscription.isDuplicate(QueueBrowserSubscription.java:72*(Compiled
>  Code))
> at org/apache/activemq/broker/region/*Queue.iterate(Queue.java:1688*(Compiled 
> Code))
> at 
> org/apache/activemq/thread/PooledTaskRunner.runTask(PooledTaskRunner.java:133(Compiled
>  Code)).
> {quote}
> Tested ActiveMQ versions: 5.9.1 and the last, 5.12.0, but of course I suppose 
> all in beetwen are affected.
> The cause seems to be the non-threadsafe usage of the *audit HashMap* member 
> of *QueueBrowserSubscription.java* class.
> Here are some facts on non thread-safe HashMap use problems:
> *High CPU / Hang on java.util.HashMap.findNonNullKeyEntry() due to 
> non-thread-safe usage of HashMap*
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21597581
> *IZ73767: INFINITE LOOP CAN OCCUR IN HASHMAP*
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IZ73767
> I must underline that *this is not an IBM JDK specific problem as the IBM JDK 
> is based on Oracle JDK* and changing the JDK or JRE is not a solution.
> The scenario may be produced with a fresh non modified install (default 
> config) of ActiveMQ broker:
> 1. set ACTIVEMQ_HOME, JAVA_HOME and PATH to point accordingly to the right 
> activemq, and Java version.
> 2. cd $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/bin; ./activemq start
> 3. inject at least 2000 messages in each of two ques, say QA.ONE and QA.TWO
> 4. $ $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/bin/activemq browse --view JMSDestination,JMSMessageID 
> --amqurl tcp://localhost:61616 QA.*
> The simplest fix that I suggest is to change in the 
> *QueueBrowserSubscription.java* class the type of *audit* member to 
> *ConcurrentHashMap*.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to