[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15051019#comment-15051019
 ] 

Justin Bertram edited comment on ARTEMIS-312 at 12/10/15 2:50 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

[~Glaucio Melo], did you try setting useGlobalPools = false and then setting 
then setting an appropriate threadPoolMaxSize for your use-case?  You are not 
restricted to using the global, unlimited pool.  As before, this is discussed 
in the documentation (e.g. 
[http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/1.1.0/thread-pooling.html]).


was (Author: jbertram):
[~Glaucio Melo], did you try setting useGlobalPools = false and then setting 
then setting an appropriate threadPoolMaxSize for your use-case?  You are not 
restricted to using the global, unlimited pool.

> Artemis clients use by default an unbounded global thread pool
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-312
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-312
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Jeff Mesnil
>            Assignee: Justin Bertram
>
> While investigating some performance issues, we noticed that Artemis clients 
> (including MDBs) use by default a "global" pool by creating a cached thread 
> pool with 0 core pool size, Integer.MAX_VALUE max size and 60s keep alive.
> This default global pool looks misconfigured. If a Artemis clients has a lot 
> of activity it is actually possible that threads are deleted from the pool 
> and added back.
> Related to this, Artemis defines a threadPoolMaxSize attribute if the client 
> is not using a global pool. But the property does not seem to be well name.
> If the Artemis client is using a "non-global" pool, this property is used to 
> create a newFixedThreadPool. So this property defines the actual size of the 
> pool, not a max size.
> As a comparison, the "global" scheduled thread is instantiating with a 5 core 
> pool size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to