[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15511591#comment-15511591
]
Quinn Stevenson commented on ARTEMIS-737:
-----------------------------------------
I don't necessarily think this approach is "better" than the existing test
suite. I was looking for something simple for end-user testing - similar to
what I contributed to ActiveMQ (activemq-junit) a while back.
I don't have any expectations on whether or not these rules would help with
testing Artemis itself - I'm not familiar enough with Artemis yet to have an
informed opinion on that. So I wouldn't expect internal Artemis tests to use
these Rules -but they could if it made sense.
And No - I didn't have any plans on converting the existing test cases. Again,
if the Rule looks like it would make sense for those tests, I'd be happy to try
and convert some of them. But these Rules were primarily targeted and
end-users (like me) who want to easily test their applications (like my Camel
routes).
> Add JUnit Rules
> ---------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-737
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Broker
> Reporter: Quinn Stevenson
> Priority: Minor
>
> ActiveMQ includes a JUnit rule for embedding a JMS Broker. This would be a
> nice feature to have for Artemis as well, along with the JUnit rules for JMS
> Clients.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
