[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16014233#comment-16014233
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on ARTEMIS-1164:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit a4e19b432bd020a307167f971fad2219f2a5ac2f in activemq-artemis's branch
refs/heads/master from [~michael.andre.pearce]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;h=a4e19b4 ]
ARTEMIS-1164: NameNotFoundException when using java.naming.provider.url to set
url via jndi
Support setting PROVIDER_URL on initial context to create default connection
factories.
> NameNotFoundException when using java.naming.provider.url to set url via jndi
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1164
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce
>
> It should be possible to create a connection factory via JNDI simply defining
> the initial context factory and provider url.
> {noformat}
> java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.activemq.artemis.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
> java.naming.provider.url=tcp://localhost:5445?type=CF
> {noformat}
> As per samples in docs.
> https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/2.0.0/using-jms.html
> This does not seems to be the case, see below test to prove this.
> {code:java}
> @Test
> public void providerURLTest() throws NamingException {
> String url = "(tcp://somehost:62616,tcp://somehost:62616)?ha=true";
>
> Properties props = new Properties();
> props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
> ActiveMQInitialContextFactory.class.getName());
> props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.PROVIDER_URL, url);
> InitialContext context = new InitialContext(props);
> ConnectionFactory connectionFactory =
> (ConnectionFactory)context.lookup("ConnectionFactory");
> }
> {code}
> It seems and mandatory param (duplicating the required and standard
> java.naming.provider.url),
> {noformat}
> props.setProperty("connectionFactory.ConnectionFactory",url);
> {noformat}
> {code:java}
> @Test
> public void connectionFactoryProperty() throws NamingException {
> String url = "(tcp://somehost:62616,tcp://somehost:62616)?ha=true";
> Properties props = new Properties();
> props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
> ActiveMQInitialContextFactory.class.getName());
> props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.PROVIDER_URL, url);
> props.setProperty("connectionFactory.ConnectionFactory",url);
> InitialContext context = new InitialContext(props);
> ConnectionFactory connectionFactory =
> (ConnectionFactory)context.lookup("ConnectionFactory");
> }
> {code}
> Either:
> A) the documentation samples need to be changed
> OR
> B) The ActiveMQInitialContextFactory should default register connection
> factory created using java.naming.provider.url as ConnectionFactory.
> I would propose the latter, as this seems to be the way in Active MQ 5 and
> some other technologies.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
