[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16014233#comment-16014233 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on ARTEMIS-1164: ---------------------------------------------------------- Commit a4e19b432bd020a307167f971fad2219f2a5ac2f in activemq-artemis's branch refs/heads/master from [~michael.andre.pearce] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;h=a4e19b4 ] ARTEMIS-1164: NameNotFoundException when using java.naming.provider.url to set url via jndi Support setting PROVIDER_URL on initial context to create default connection factories. > NameNotFoundException when using java.naming.provider.url to set url via jndi > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ARTEMIS-1164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1164 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce > > It should be possible to create a connection factory via JNDI simply defining > the initial context factory and provider url. > {noformat} > java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.activemq.artemis.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory > java.naming.provider.url=tcp://localhost:5445?type=CF > {noformat} > As per samples in docs. > https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/2.0.0/using-jms.html > This does not seems to be the case, see below test to prove this. > {code:java} > @Test > public void providerURLTest() throws NamingException { > String url = "(tcp://somehost:62616,tcp://somehost:62616)?ha=true"; > > Properties props = new Properties(); > props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, > ActiveMQInitialContextFactory.class.getName()); > props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.PROVIDER_URL, url); > InitialContext context = new InitialContext(props); > ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = > (ConnectionFactory)context.lookup("ConnectionFactory"); > } > {code} > It seems and mandatory param (duplicating the required and standard > java.naming.provider.url), > {noformat} > props.setProperty("connectionFactory.ConnectionFactory",url); > {noformat} > {code:java} > @Test > public void connectionFactoryProperty() throws NamingException { > String url = "(tcp://somehost:62616,tcp://somehost:62616)?ha=true"; > Properties props = new Properties(); > props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, > ActiveMQInitialContextFactory.class.getName()); > props.setProperty(javax.naming.Context.PROVIDER_URL, url); > props.setProperty("connectionFactory.ConnectionFactory",url); > InitialContext context = new InitialContext(props); > ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = > (ConnectionFactory)context.lookup("ConnectionFactory"); > } > {code} > Either: > A) the documentation samples need to be changed > OR > B) The ActiveMQInitialContextFactory should default register connection > factory created using java.naming.provider.url as ConnectionFactory. > I would propose the latter, as this seems to be the way in Active MQ 5 and > some other technologies. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)