[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16023439#comment-16023439
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1179:
-----------------------------------------

Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1288
  
    oh yeay sevntu not available again....
    
    [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin 
org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:3.3.0 or one of its dependencies could not 
be resolved: Could not find artifact 
org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:jar:3.3.0 in sevntu-maven 
(http://sevntu-checkstyle.github.io/sevntu.checkstyle/maven2) @ 
    
    On a serious note, it seem this tool in the repo, isn't reliable, this 
isn't the first time I've seen this issue or others have. How much real value 
is it adding?


> Add Optional Client JMS Destination Cache
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1179
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1179
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce
>
> Some frameworks, constantly resolve the destination by name on every send, 
> rather than caching this.
> Spring is one such very popular framework, but we have seen this 
> unfortunately else where (no doubt replicating springs logic at some point of 
> history)
> This causes a performance issue, and obviously extra calls to the broker as 
> currently the artemis jms client calls the broker to check the address.
> In some enterprise/platform setups where destinations excluding temporary 
> destinations, destinations/address's are created permanently broker side, as 
> such the destination once resolved on the client can be permanently cached 
> thus avoiding the above mentioned performance and extra calls to the broker.
> The default should keep the existing behaviour, but users should be able to 
> opt in to this benefit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to