[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tim Bain updated AMQ-6938:
--------------------------
    Description: 
It was reported on the user mailing list 
([http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-failed-to-start-ActiveMQ-td4737631.html)]
 that a user is seeing the broker fail to start due to "java.io.IOException: 
Could not locate data file /data/kahadb/db-531.log" even though 
ignoreMissingJournalFiles is set to true. Presumably the purpose of that option 
is to allow the broker to ignore missing journal files (otherwise we chose 
poorly when naming the option and then failed to document it adequately on the 
wiki), which means the option doesn't work properly in all situations.

Looking at the code on master as of 3/25/2018, 
org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase.recover() calls 
journal.getNextLocation(null) on line 677, which will throw the exception in 
question when DataFile.getDataFile() is called. This call to 
journal.getNextLocation() occurs outside of the while loop, whereas the 
ignoreMissingJournalFiles value is only checked in the catch block within the 
while loop, so we do not consider the ignoreMissingJournalFiles value in the 
call to getNextLocation(), even though missing journal files can cause 
getNextLocation() to fail.

Note that the file is missing because the user manually deleted it in an effort 
to work around AMQ-6931, but that should not be relevant to the behavior that's 
being seen.

  was:
It was reported on the user mailing list 
([http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-failed-to-start-ActiveMQ-td4737631.html)]
 that a user is seeing the broker fail to start due to "java.io.IOException: 
Could not locate data file /data/kahadb/db-531.log" even though 
ignoreMissingJournalFiles is set to true. Presumably the purpose of that option 
is to allow the broker to ignore missing journal files (otherwise we chose 
poorly when naming the option and then failed to document it adequately on the 
wiki), which means the option doesn't work properly in all situations.

Looking at the code on master as of 3/25/2018, 
org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase.recover() calls 
journal.getNextLocation(null) on line 677, which will throw the exception in 
question when DataFile.getDataFile() is called. This call to 
journal.getNextLocation() occurs outside of the while loop, whereas the 
ignoreMissingJournalFiles value is only checked in the catch block within the 
while loop, so we do not consider the ignoreMissingJournalFiles value in the 
call to getNextLocation(), even though missing journal files can cause 
getNextLocation() to fail.


> KahaDB's ignoreMissingJournalFiles argument doesn't actually ignore missing 
> journal files
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-6938
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6938
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: KahaDB
>    Affects Versions: 5.13.1
>            Reporter: Tim Bain
>            Priority: Major
>
> It was reported on the user mailing list 
> ([http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-failed-to-start-ActiveMQ-td4737631.html)]
>  that a user is seeing the broker fail to start due to "java.io.IOException: 
> Could not locate data file /data/kahadb/db-531.log" even though 
> ignoreMissingJournalFiles is set to true. Presumably the purpose of that 
> option is to allow the broker to ignore missing journal files (otherwise we 
> chose poorly when naming the option and then failed to document it adequately 
> on the wiki), which means the option doesn't work properly in all situations.
> Looking at the code on master as of 3/25/2018, 
> org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase.recover() calls 
> journal.getNextLocation(null) on line 677, which will throw the exception in 
> question when DataFile.getDataFile() is called. This call to 
> journal.getNextLocation() occurs outside of the while loop, whereas the 
> ignoreMissingJournalFiles value is only checked in the catch block within the 
> while loop, so we do not consider the ignoreMissingJournalFiles value in the 
> call to getNextLocation(), even though missing journal files can cause 
> getNextLocation() to fail.
> Note that the file is missing because the user manually deleted it in an 
> effort to work around AMQ-6931, but that should not be relevant to the 
> behavior that's being seen.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to