[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16660840#comment-16660840
 ] 

Alan Protasio commented on AMQ-7080:
------------------------------------

[~gtully] Cool! Thanks!! I saw that it's already fixed! That was fast! :D

Did you have a chance to look at this PR?

Cheers.. 

> Keep track of free pages - Update db.free file during checkpoints
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-7080
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7080
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: KahaDB
>    Affects Versions: 5.15.6
>            Reporter: Alan Protasio
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 5.16.0, 5.15.7
>
>         Attachments: AMQ-7080-freeList-update.diff
>
>
> In a event of an unclean shutdown, Activemq loses the information about the 
> free pages in the index. In order to recover this information, ActiveMQ read 
> the whole index during shutdown searching for free pages and then save the 
> db.free file. This operation can take a long time, making the failover 
> slower. (during the shutdown, activemq will still hold the lock).
> From http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
> {quote}"If you have a SAN or shared file system it can be used to provide 
> high availability such that if a broker is killed, another broker can take 
> over immediately."
> {quote}
> Is important to note if the shutdown takes more than ACTIVEMQ_KILL_MAXSECONDS 
> seconds, any following shutdown will be unclean. This broker will stay in 
> this state unless the index is deleted (this state means that every failover 
> will take more then ACTIVEMQ_KILL_MAXSECONDS, so, if you increase this time 
> to 5 minutes, you fail over can take more than 5 minutes).
>  
> In order to prevent ActiveMQ reading the whole index file to search for free 
> pages, we can keep track of those on every Checkpoint. In order to do that we 
> need to be sure that db.data and db.free are in sync. To achieve that we can 
> have a attribute in the db.free page that is referenced by the db.data.
> So during the checkpoint we have:
> 1 - Save db.free and give a freePageUniqueId
> 2 - Save this freePageUniqueId in the db.data (metadata)
> In a crash, we can see if the db.data has the same freePageUniqueId as the 
> db.free. If this is the case we can safely use the free page information 
> contained in the db.free
> Now, the only way to read the whole index file again is IF the crash happens 
> btw step 1 and 2 (what is very unlikely).
> The drawback of this implementation is that we will have to save db.free 
> during the checkpoint, what can possibly increase the checkpoint time.
> Is also important to note that we CAN (and should) have stale data in db.free 
> as it is referencing stale db.data:
> Imagine the timeline:
> T0 -> P1, P2 and P3 are free.
> T1 -> Checkpoint
> T2 -> P1 got occupied.
> T3 -> Crash
> In the current scenario after the  Pagefile#load the P1 will be free and then 
> the replay will mark P1 as occupied or will occupied another page (now that 
> the recovery of free pages is done on shutdown)
> This change only make sure that db.data and db.free are in sync and showing 
> the reality in T1 (checkpoint), If they are in sync we can trust the db.free.
> This is a really fast draft of what i'm suggesting... If you guys agree, i 
> can create the proper patch after:
> [https://github.com/alanprot/activemq/commit/18036ef7214ef0eaa25c8650f40644dd8b4632a5]
>  
> This is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6590



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to