[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17476398#comment-17476398
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ARTEMIS-3620:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit b526c9d0f7964444834e9fc6fe0bc49c794a476f in activemq-artemis's branch 
refs/heads/2.19.x from franz1981
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;h=b526c9d ]

ARTEMIS-3620 Journal blocking delete/update record with no sync

(cherry picked from commit 52fcc0c81b84c3f6896b4a7ada97df7ff2831f8c)


> Journal blocking delete/update record with no sync 
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-3620
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3620
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Francesco Nigro
>            Assignee: Francesco Nigro
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 1.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3605, part of ARTEMIS-3327, 
> has introduced a blocking logic while checking for record's presence on both 
> delete and update operations, regardless the configured {{sync}} parameter.
> Before the mentioned change, the journal was using {{checkKnownRecordID}} to 
> check for record presence that can save blocking in the happy (and most 
> common) path: 
> {code:java}
>   private boolean checkKnownRecordID(final long id, boolean strict) throws 
> Exception {
>       if (records.containsKey(id) || pendingRecords.contains(id) || 
> (compactor != null && compactor.containsRecord(id))) {
>          return true;
>       }
>       final SimpleFuture<Boolean> known = new SimpleFutureImpl<>();
>       // retry on the append thread. maybe the appender thread is not keeping 
> up.
>       appendExecutor.execute(new Runnable() {
>          @Override
>          public void run() {
>             journalLock.readLock().lock();
>             try {
>                known.set(records.containsKey(id)
>                   || pendingRecords.contains(id)
>                   || (compactor != null && compactor.containsRecord(id)));
>             } finally {
>                journalLock.readLock().unlock();
>             }
>          }
>       });
>       if (!known.get()) {
>          if (strict) {
>             throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot find add info " + id + " 
> on compactor or current records");
>          }
>          return false;
>       } else {
>          return true;
>       }
>    }
> {code}
> There are 3 solutions to this issue:
> # reintroduce {{checkKnownRecordID}} and save blocking in the common & happy 
> path
> # introduce a smaller semantic change that don't report any error with no 
> sync and no callback specified 
> # introduce a bigger semantic change that don't report any error due to 
> missing record ID to delete/update
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to