[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17752093#comment-17752093 ]
Robbie Gemmell commented on AMQ-9297: ------------------------------------- Its not something I am working on...but at the previously referenced links, such as the specific PR for the changes you are interested in, you might have found useful comments like: [https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/996#issuecomment-1658481899] and [https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/996#issuecomment-1660329766] > Activemq jakarta namespace support still depends on some javax.jms packages > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-9297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9297 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Broker > Affects Versions: 5.18.2 > Reporter: Jayeshkumar > Priority: Major > > Hello, > I am currently moving from 5.16.5 version to activemq 5.18.2 which has > support for jakarta namespace, however there are still references to old > javax packages, I am getting ClassNotFoundException for > javax.jms.JMSException, but the right package should be jakarta.jms which is > already present > In the 5.18.2 zip distribution, I see jakarta-jms-api-2.X is used for which > the underlying package is still javax and not jakarta. Rather to fully > support jakarta namespace, we should plan and move to jakarta-jms-3.X which > has the right package structure. Any reference to javax.jms should be > replaced to use the new namespace > So the existing support needs some more work before we can use it seamlessly. > Can you please review and share your views on this -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)