[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Baptiste Onofré resolved AMQ-8277.
---------------------------------------
Resolution: Auto Closed
> Subscriber with additional predicate causes ClassCastException and doesn't
> forward messages between brokers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-8277
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8277
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 5.16.2
> Reporter: Jonathan Gallimore
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have a network of brokers set up, and use a plugin to set the additional
> predicate, to enable message filtering based on the consumer.
> (JavaDoc for MessageConsumer.setAdditionalPredicate() is "A transient
> additional predicate that can be used it inject additional predicates into
> the selector on the fly. Handy if if say a Security Broker interceptor wants
> to filter out messages based on security level of the consumer.")
> This works fine for a single broker, or in a failover scenario, but if used
> with a network of brokers, whenever the consumer starts, the following
> exception is thrown, and messages are not forwarded across the network for
> this consumer.
>
> java.lang.ClassCastException: class
> org.apache.activemq.filter.ComparisonExpression$1 cannot be cast to class
> org.apache.activemq.command.DataStructure
> (org.apache.activemq.filter.ComparisonExpression$1 and
> org.apache.activemq.command.DataStructure are in unnamed module of loader
> org.apache.catalina.loader.ParallelWebappClassLoader @749f539e)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v12.ConsumerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(ConsumerInfoMarshaller.java:133)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:400)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v12.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:130)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v12.MessageMarshaller.tightMarshal1(MessageMarshaller.java:140)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v12.ActiveMQMessageMarshaller.tightMarshal1(ActiveMQMessageMarshaller.java:76)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:400)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v12.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:130)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v12.MessageDispatchMarshaller.tightMarshal1(MessageDispatchMarshaller.java:87)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.marshal(OpenWireFormat.java:226)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.oneway(TcpTransport.java:193)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.doOnewaySend(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:335)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.oneway(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:317)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.oneway(TransportFilter.java:94)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.oneway(WireFormatNegotiator.java:116)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:68)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.dispatch(TransportConnection.java:1474)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processDispatch(TransportConnection.java:972)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.iterate(TransportConnection.java:1022)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner.runTask(PooledTaskRunner.java:133)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner$1.run(PooledTaskRunner.java:48)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
>
> This is very similar to the exception noted in this query:
> [http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Network-broker-and-filter-predicate-td2367038.html]
>
> This appears to be down to the *Expression objects not implementing
> DataStructure, and therefore not being marshalable to OpenWire format.
> I have prepared a simple patch with a unit test which I'll provide as a PR.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
