[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Daniel Martin updated ARTEMIS-4721: ----------------------------------- Description: The [user manual for version 2.33.0|https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/mqtt.html#wildcard-subscriptions] makes the recommendation to use the following configuration to match the MQTT specification for better performance: {code:java} <wildcard-addresses> <delimiter>/</delimiter> <any-words>#</any-words> <single-word>*</single-word> </wildcard-addresses> {code} Shouldn't it recommend "+" instead of "*" for single levels? Additionally, it would be good to clarify where this XML node is supposed to go. Top level? Inside {{{}<configuration>{}}}? Inside {{{}<core>{}}}? Somewhere else? was: The [user manual for version 2.33.0|https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/mqtt.html#wildcard-subscriptions] makes the recommendation to use the following configuration to match the MQTT specification for better performance: {code:java} <wildcard-addresses> <delimiter>/</delimiter> <any-words>#</any-words> <single-word>*</single-word> </wildcard-addresses> {code} Shouldn't it recommend "+" instead of "*" for single levels? > Possible documentation error in wildcard syntax recommendation > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARTEMIS-4721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4721 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Bug > Components: MQTT > Affects Versions: 2.33.0 > Reporter: Daniel Martin > Priority: Minor > > The [user manual for version > 2.33.0|https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/mqtt.html#wildcard-subscriptions] > makes the recommendation to use the following configuration to match the > MQTT specification for better performance: > {code:java} > <wildcard-addresses> > <delimiter>/</delimiter> > <any-words>#</any-words> > <single-word>*</single-word> > </wildcard-addresses> {code} > Shouldn't it recommend "+" instead of "*" for single levels? > Additionally, it would be good to clarify where this XML node is supposed to > go. Top level? Inside {{{}<configuration>{}}}? Inside {{{}<core>{}}}? > Somewhere else? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)