[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15623872#comment-15623872
 ] 

Swapan Shridhar commented on AMBARI-17126:
------------------------------------------

[~allmusic76]

{quote}
1.) Is this actively being looked at for 2.5? (Is there an estimated release 
date for 2.5?)
{quote}
- It is not for Ambari-2.5. 
{quote}

2.) Also, why exactly was AMBARI-7896 closed and being tracked here? 
Active-Passive fault tolerance/redundancy isn't necessarily the same concept as 
high availability.
{quote}
Here also, we are working on having one Ambari server active at one point of 
time and other passive/non-active, and we are not doing the load balancing part 
as part of this JIRA.

> Provide Ambari Server HA (active-passive)
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-17126
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17126
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Jeff Sposetti
>            Assignee: Swapan Shridhar
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>
> Ability to configure Ambari Server active-passive setup behind Load balancer.
> -Both servers should point to the same database (external to Ambari Server) . 
> Preferably Server.jdbc.hostname should point to a HA DB Cluster from both 
> server's ambari.properties.
> -Load Balancer (preferably an external solution, like F5, Cisco, Brocade etc) 
> to create VIP and use the Ambari server as Real to direct traffic to either 
> host rather than keeping one as Standby (Agent ini file should point to DNS 
> of VIP rather than to a server directly)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to