[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15822232#comment-15822232
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-19524:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12847360/AMBARI-19524_trunk.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 2 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/10045//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/10045//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Use stack-level Atlas conf directory instead of hard-coded /etc/atlas/conf 
> path
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-19524
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-19524
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Vishal Suvagia
>            Assignee: Vishal Suvagia
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-19524_branch-2.5.patch, AMBARI-19524_trunk.patch
>
>
> This is a bug that should have been fixed in Ambari 2.4 but showed up too 
> late in the release and has repercussions to test it.
> Basically, status_params.py for Atlas service in Ambari sets
> {code}
> conf_dir = os.environ['METADATA_CONF'] if 'METADATA_CONF' in os.environ else 
> '/etc/atlas/conf'
> {code}
> This is technically incorrect since /etc/atlas/conf is a symlink to 
> /usr/hdp/current/atlas-client/conf, which is then a symlink to 
> /etc/atlas/$some_version/0
> During Rolling Upgrade,
> 1. Atlas Server is stopped, new configs are written to 
> /etc/atlas/$new_version/0, then symlink is changed so that 
> /usr/hdp/current/atlas-server points to new version, and Atlas Server is 
> started
> At this point, /etc/atlas/conf -> /usr/hdp/current/atlas-client/conf (which 
> is still using the old version) since the client has not yet been updated.
> 2. Atlas Client has new configs written to /etc/atlas/$new_version/0, then 
> symlink is changed so that /usr/hdp/current/atlas-client points to new version
> Basically, we need to look at the usages of conf_dir and make sure it is 
> correct during all scenarios.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to