[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15894170#comment-15894170
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-20291:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12855818/AMBARI-20291_2.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
ambari-server.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/10866//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/10866//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Script-Based Alert Dispathers support passing more parameters to script
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-20291
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20291
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Yao Lei
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-20291_2.patch
>
>
> Script-Based Alert Dispatcher now pass five parameters to script,including 
> alert definition name, definition label,service name, alert state, and alert 
> text.
> But if script can receive other two parameters from dispather,it will be 
> better.
> 1.hostname.
> Because hostname the alert for is not always included in alert text,although 
> it may be null like aggregate alerts. 
>   With it we can more quick to find the related host that occured alert.
> 2.alert timestamp.
>   We may need to know the alert occurrence time ( state change time) more 
> exactly. After the alert happened,it will spend some time to schedule the 
> script to run.
>   Without it,we can only regard the script start time as the alert occurrence 
> time.
> We now use this feature to send alert information to mobile phone and suggest 
> also passing hostname and alert timestamp.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to