[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15985165#comment-15985165
 ] 

Hudson commented on AMBARI-20862:
---------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Ambari-branch-2.5 #1451 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-branch-2.5/1451/])
AMBARI-20862 inconsistent suggestion for llap "Maximum Total Concurrent 
(ababiichuk: 
[http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ambari.git&a=commit&h=804b922f91f50cffdfab5c2ddb4553f188badce4])
* (edit) 
ambari-web/test/views/common/configs/widgets/slider_config_widget_view_test.js
* (edit) 
ambari-web/app/views/common/configs/widgets/slider_config_widget_view.js


> inconsistent suggestion for llap "Maximum Total Concurrent Queries"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-20862
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20862
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-web
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Andrii Babiichuk
>            Assignee: Andrii Babiichuk
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.5.1
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-20862.patch
>
>
> ====================================
> Info
> This cluster has gone through below upgrade.
> Ambari 2.4.2.0-115 - 2.5.0.3-8
> HDP 2.5.3-14 - HDP 2.6.0.3-8
> ====================================
> 1] Login and proceed to Hive configs
> 2] Select "Interactive query queue" in below mentioned order.
> "default" -> "llap" -> "validator"
> In the above order "Maximum Total Concurrent Queries" suggested for llap 
> queue is "2"
> 3] Now select "Interactive query queue" in below mentioned order.
> "validator" -> "llap" -> "default"
> In the above order "Maximum Total Concurrent Queries" suggested for llap 
> queue is "5"
> 4] When I try to save config for "5", the recommendation screen shows "10"



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to