[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16539005#comment-16539005
 ] 

Krisztian Szucs commented on ARROW-2792:
----------------------------------------

[~wesmckinn] We probably need to split the builds (define matrix in tasks.yml 
instead of the templates), because linux packages starts to timeout on travis 
and to prevent artifact collisions within a single task. 

Something like:

{code}
  wheel-win:
    platform: win
    template: python-wheels/appveyor.yml
    matrix:
      cp35: # variant
        generator: Visual Studio 14 2015 Win64
        numpy: "1.13"
        python: "3.5"
      cp36:
        generator: Visual Studio 14 2015 Win64
        numpy: "1.13"
        python: "3.6"
    artifacts:
      - pyarrow-{version}-{variant}-{variant}m-win_amd64.whl
      - pyarrow-{version}-{variant}-{variant}m-win_amd64.whl
{code}

I'm not exactly sure on the matrix definition though.

> [Packaging] Consider uploading tarballs to avoid naming conflicts
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-2792
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2792
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Packaging
>            Reporter: Krisztian Szucs
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>
> [~kou] has suggested, that we should upload tarballs for linux package 
> builds, to include all .deb and/or .rpm packages.
> For conda packages currenlty we postfix the artifacts with the arch name to 
> avoid naming conflicts. To remain consistent we should chose one of the 
> strategies (postifx or tarballs) and apply for each tasks.
> However tarballs would be a trivial solution to resolve naming conflicts, 
> ensuring that a tarball contains all of the expected artifacts would require 
> to download and extract it beforehand. This requires changes in status checks 
> and artifact downloading / signing.
> [~cpcloud] thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to