[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16624772#comment-16624772
 ] 

Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2840:
-------------------------------------

Looking at this in conjunction with ARROW-3212

> [C++] See if stream alignment logic can be simplified
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-2840
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2840
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Wes McKinney
>            Assignee: Wes McKinney
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.11.0
>
>
> There were a couple patches related to 64-byte alignment for tensor messages 
> at the beginning of April that I've been concerned about: 
> ARROW-2308: 
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/26bc4ab5a31e3430e1d545068e5a5a5ba5bc7a22#diff-bf4eb56f3cb806c32f60ae67afbb1bf0
> ARROW-2437: 
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/0f87c12d45250ee763ac8c43b7e57e8f06a0b9f3
> In my opinion, the alignment issue should be encapsulated in the protocol if 
> possible; to have argument that toggles whether the file is to be aligned 
> after reading the metadata seems wrong to me. The bytes written for alignment 
> purposes should be accounted for in the metadata size prefix in the IPC 
> message.
> Since there are unit tests for this, I'd like to take a look and see if I can 
> improve this without breaking the tests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to