[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Wes McKinney moved PARQUET-1324 to ARROW-3772:
----------------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: cpp-1.6.0)
                   0.13.0
      Component/s:     (was: parquet-cpp)
                   C++
         Workflow: jira  (was: patch-available, re-open possible)
              Key: ARROW-3772  (was: PARQUET-1324)
          Project: Apache Arrow  (was: Parquet)

> [C++] Read Parquet dictionary encoded ColumnChunks directly into an Arrow 
> DictionaryArray
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-3772
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3772
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Stav Nir
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: parquet
>             Fix For: 0.13.0
>
>
> Dictionary data is very common in parquet, in the current implementation 
> parquet-cpp decodes dictionary encoded data always before creating a plain 
> arrow array. This process is wasteful since we could use arrow's 
> DictionaryArray directly and achieve several benefits:
>  # Smaller memory footprint - both in the decoding process and in the 
> resulting arrow table - especially when the dict values are large
>  # Better decoding performance - mostly as a result of the first bullet - 
> less memory fetches and less allocations.
> I think those benefits could achieve significant improvements in runtime.
> My direction for the implementation is to read the indices (through the 
> DictionaryDecoder, after the RLE decoding) and values separately into 2 
> arrays and create a DictionaryArray using them.
> There are some questions to discuss:
>  # Should this be the default behavior for dictionary encoded data
>  # Should it be controlled with a parameter in the API
>  # What should be the policy in case some of the chunks are dictionary 
> encoded and some are not.
> I started implementing this but would like to hear your opinions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to