paleolimbot commented on issue #20: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/issues/20#issuecomment-1216058824
I think we could get it down to something like that...off the top of my head I can see 2 .h and 3 .c making sense (nanoarrow.h, nanarrow_inline.h, array.c, schema.c, util.c). I like that nanoarrow.h only has declarations (easy to browse) and keeping a vague separation is sort of nice for development (if the files get too big I find VSCode's intellisense goes a bit haywire). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
