ZhangHuiGui opened a new issue, #40380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/40380
### Describe the usage question you have. Please include as many useful
details as possible.
## Request like below
PostgreSQL like below:
```sql
postgres=# explain verbose select * from a,b where (a.c1+1)=b.c1;
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Join (cost=55.90..1477.27 rows=23052 width=20)
Output: a.c1, a.c2, a.c3, b.c1, b.c2
Hash Cond: (b.c1 = (a.c1 + 1))
-> Seq Scan on public.b (cost=0.00..32.60 rows=2260 width=8)
Output: b.c1, b.c2
-> Hash (cost=30.40..30.40 rows=2040 width=12)
Output: a.c1, a.c2, a.c3
-> Seq Scan on public.a (cost=0.00..30.40 rows=2040 width=12)
Output: a.c1, a.c2, a.c3
```
For this kind of situation, the hash-key will become an expression rather
than a field_ref.
For this situation, we need do project for the hash-key first when we select
the hash-key-batch before we do build/probe.
But for now, seems we're not supporting this in basic_join and swiss_join
implementation?
### Component(s)
C++
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
