[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14337302#comment-14337302
]
Bill Farner commented on AURORA-1152:
-------------------------------------
I agree with Zameer, and i think this conclusion is misguided:
{quote}
which obviates the need for a host limit
{quote}
The dedicated setting shouldn't carry along policy about diversity/affinity.
> Consider preventing host limit when dedicated is set
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AURORA-1152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1152
> Project: Aurora
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: Reliability
> Reporter: Joe Smith
>
> Right now, some users take advantage of 'dedicated' machines to schedule
> their jobs. This gives them fine-grained control over where their tasks land
> in the datacenter, which obviates the need for a host limit.
> This extra constraint can give an extra layer of complexity when debugging
> scheduling 'issues' and should instead be fully replaced by how the dedicated
> machines are distributed.
> If an installation also offers the concept of a 'rack' then this feature
> should consider how to enable easily preventing a 'rack limit' or 'PDU limit'
> (etc) as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
