[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6200?focusedWorklogId=175265&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-175265
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-6200:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 14/Dec/18 10:07
            Start Date: 14/Dec/18 10:07
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: aromanenko-dev commented on issue #7263: [BEAM-6200] 
Deprecate old HadoopInputFormatIO, move it into new HadoopFormatIO
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7263#issuecomment-447277919
 
 
   @dmvk I addressed your comments and pushed the changes. 
   
   Regarding your concerns - I agree that this type of tests, that require 
running embedded cluster, take more time than it should be for unit-tests. In 
the same time, the total running time (about 1 min for all tests) is still 
acceptable imo and they allow to test HadoopFormat.Read with different input 
formats. So, I think it's not an issue in this case.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 175265)
    Time Spent: 1h  (was: 50m)

> Deprecate HadoopInputFormatIO
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-6200
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6200
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: io-java-hadoop
>            Reporter: Alexey Romanenko
>            Assignee: Alexey Romanenko
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Merge {{Read}} and {{Write}} into one single {{HadoopFormatIO, deprecate 
> }}{{HadoopInputFormatIO}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to