[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Norkin updated BEAM-6168:
------------------------------
    Description: 
I have an Apache Beam streaming job which reads data from Kafka and writes to 
ElasticSearch using ElasticSearchIO.

The issue I'm having is that messages in Kafka already have _{{key}}_ field, 
and using {{ElasticSearchIO.Write.withIdFn()}} I'm mapping this field to 
document _{{_id}}_ field in ElasticSearch.

Having a big volume of data I don't want the _{{key}}_ field to be also written 
to ElasticSearch as part of _{{_source}}_.

Is there an option/workaround that would allow doing that?

  was:
I have an Apache Beam streaming job which reads data from Kafka and writes to 
ElasticSearch using ElasticSearchIO.

The issue I'm having is that messages in Kafka already have _{{key}}_ field, 
and using {{ElasticSearchIO.Write.withIdFn()}} I'm mapping this field to 
document _{{_id}}_ field in ElasticSearch.

Having a big volume of data I don't want the _{{key}}_ field to be also written 
to ElasticSearch as a separate field and as part of _{{_source}}_.

Is there an option/workaround that would allow doing that?


> Allow modification of JSON value before writing to ElasticSearch
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-6168
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6168
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io-java-elasticsearch
>            Reporter: Mark Norkin
>            Assignee: Etienne Chauchot
>            Priority: Major
>
> I have an Apache Beam streaming job which reads data from Kafka and writes to 
> ElasticSearch using ElasticSearchIO.
> The issue I'm having is that messages in Kafka already have _{{key}}_ field, 
> and using {{ElasticSearchIO.Write.withIdFn()}} I'm mapping this field to 
> document _{{_id}}_ field in ElasticSearch.
> Having a big volume of data I don't want the _{{key}}_ field to be also 
> written to ElasticSearch as part of _{{_source}}_.
> Is there an option/workaround that would allow doing that?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to