[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6405?focusedWorklogId=183805&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-183805
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-6405:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 10/Jan/19 16:56
            Start Date: 10/Jan/19 16:56
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: tweise commented on issue #7459: [BEAM-6405] Reduce 
parallelism of PortableValidatesRunner tests
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7459#issuecomment-453170056
 
 
   Nice! We had the same issue with the Python VR tests some time ago; this 
should cut down resource consumption significantly.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 183805)
    Time Spent: 1h 20m  (was: 1h 10m)

> Improve PortableValidatesRunner test reliability on Jenkins
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-6405
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6405
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: runner-flink
>            Reporter: Maximilian Michels
>            Assignee: Maximilian Michels
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The PVR tests seem to be passing fine and then failing consecutively for no 
> reason: https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_PVR_Flink_Batch/ 
> It looks like the outrageous parallelism, i.e. number of available cores, is 
> responsible for the flakiness if there is additional load on the build 
> slaves. We should lower the parallelism.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to