[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11271?focusedWorklogId=593056&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-593056 ]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-11271: ----------------------------------------- Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 06/May/21 23:00 Start Date: 06/May/21 23:00 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: chamikaramj commented on pull request #14395: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14395#issuecomment-833930452 Thanks for the feedback @kmjung. +1 for merging. LGTM -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking ------------------- Worklog Id: (was: 593056) Time Spent: 1.5h (was: 1h 20m) > Update BigQuery source to perform datasets.get instead of tables.get to > determine location > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: BEAM-11271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11271 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io-java-gcp > Reporter: Chamikara Madhusanka Jayalath > Priority: P3 > Time Spent: 1.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > For Java we have to update referencedTables.get(0) call in following location: > https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/release-2.26.0/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/BigQueryQueryHelper.java#L111 > > Based on user feedback, seems like datasets.get is preferable to tables.get > due to not requiring access to table metadata. > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)