[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7978?focusedWorklogId=301800&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-301800
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-7978:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 27/Aug/19 08:56
            Start Date: 27/Aug/19 08:56
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: aromanenko-dev commented on issue #9432: [BEAM-7978] 
Return BACKLOG_UNKNOWN in case of unknown watermark
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9432#issuecomment-525208039
 
 
   Run Java PreCommit
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 301800)
    Time Spent: 0.5h  (was: 20m)

> ArithmeticExceptions on getting backlog bytes 
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-7978
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7978
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io-java-kinesis
>    Affects Versions: 2.14.0
>            Reporter: Mateusz
>            Assignee: Alexey Romanenko
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hello,
> Beam 2.14.0
>  (and to be more precise 
> [commit|https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/9fe0a0387ad1f894ef02acf32edbc9623a3b13ad#diff-b4964a457006b1555c7042c739b405ec])
>  introduced a change in watermark calculation in Kinesis IO causing below 
> error:
> {code:java}
> exception:  "java.lang.RuntimeException: Unknown kinesis failure, when trying 
> to reach kinesis
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.kinesis.SimplifiedKinesisClient.wrapExceptions(SimplifiedKinesisClient.java:227)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.kinesis.SimplifiedKinesisClient.getBacklogBytes(SimplifiedKinesisClient.java:167)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.kinesis.SimplifiedKinesisClient.getBacklogBytes(SimplifiedKinesisClient.java:155)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.kinesis.KinesisReader.getTotalBacklogBytes(KinesisReader.java:158)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.StreamingModeExecutionContext.flushState(StreamingModeExecutionContext.java:433)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.StreamingDataflowWorker.process(StreamingDataflowWorker.java:1289)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.StreamingDataflowWorker.access$1000(StreamingDataflowWorker.java:149)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.StreamingDataflowWorker$6.run(StreamingDataflowWorker.java:1024)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: java.lang.ArithmeticException: Value cannot fit in an int: 
> 153748963401
>       at org.joda.time.field.FieldUtils.safeToInt(FieldUtils.java:229)
>       at 
> org.joda.time.field.BaseDurationField.getDifference(BaseDurationField.java:141)
>       at 
> org.joda.time.base.BaseSingleFieldPeriod.between(BaseSingleFieldPeriod.java:72)
>       at org.joda.time.Minutes.minutesBetween(Minutes.java:101)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.kinesis.SimplifiedKinesisClient.lambda$getBacklogBytes$3(SimplifiedKinesisClient.java:169)
>       at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.kinesis.SimplifiedKinesisClient.wrapExceptions(SimplifiedKinesisClient.java:210)
>       ... 10 more
> {code}
> We spotted this issue on Dataflow runner. It's problematic as inability to 
> get backlog bytes seems to result in constant recreation of KinesisReader.
> The issue happens if the backlog bytes are retrieved before watermark value 
> is updated from initial default value. Easy way to reproduce it is to create 
> a pipeline with Kinesis source for a stream where no records are being put. 
> While debugging it locally, you can observe that the watermark is set to the 
> value on the past (like: "-290308-12-21T19:59:05.225Z"). After two minutes 
> (default watermark idle duration threshold is set to 2 minutes) , the 
> watermark is set to value of 
> [watermarkIdleThreshold|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/9fe0a0387ad1f894ef02acf32edbc9623a3b13ad/sdks/java/io/kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kinesis/WatermarkPolicyFactory.java#L110]),
>  so the next backlog bytes retrieval should be correct. However, as described 
> before, running the pipeline on Dataflow runner results in KinesisReader 
> being closed just after creation, so the watermark won't be fixed.
> The reason of the issue is following: The introduced watermark policies are 
> relying on 
> [WatermarkParameters|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/9fe0a0387ad1f894ef02acf32edbc9623a3b13ad/sdks/java/io/kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kinesis/WatermarkParameters.java]
>  which initialises currentWatermark and eventTime to 
> [BoundedWindow.TIMESTAMP_MIN_VALUE|https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/9fe0a0387ad1f894ef02acf32edbc9623a3b13ad#diff-b4964a457006b1555c7042c739b405ecR52].
>  This result in watermark being set to new Instant(-9223372036854775L) at the 
> KinesisReader creation. Calculated [period between the watermark and the 
> current 
> timestamp|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/9fe0a0387ad1f894ef02acf32edbc9623a3b13ad/sdks/java/io/kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kinesis/SimplifiedKinesisClient.java#L169]
>  is bigger than expected causing the ArithmeticException to be thrown.
> The maximum retention on Kinesis streams is  [7 
> days|https://aws.amazon.com/kinesis/data-streams/faqs/] so it should be safe 
> to initialise the affected watermark parameters with new 
> Instant().minus(MAX_KINESIS_STREAM_RETENTION_PERIOD) where 
> MAX_KINESIS_STREAM_RETENTION_PERIOD is the duration of 7 days.
> Remark: seems that in the past there was similar issue present (fixed in 
> 2.4). Please look into the 
> [ticket|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3881]. 
> Best regards,
>  Mateusz



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to