[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7984?focusedWorklogId=302493&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-302493
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-7984:
----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 28/Aug/19 01:43
Start Date: 28/Aug/19 01:43
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: robertwb commented on issue #9344: [BEAM-7984] The
coder returned for typehints.List should be IterableCoder
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9344#issuecomment-525548615
Yeah, leaving as is, with some comments, seems the best path forward.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 302493)
Time Spent: 50m (was: 40m)
> [python] The coder returned for typehints.List should be IterableCoder
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-7984
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7984
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: sdk-py-core
> Reporter: Chad Dombrova
> Assignee: Chad Dombrova
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> IterableCoder encodes a list and decodes to list, but
> typecoders.registry.get_coder(typehints.List[bytes]) returns a
> FastPrimitiveCoder. I don't see any reason why this would be advantageous.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)
