[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8935?focusedWorklogId=364909&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-364909
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-8935:
----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 31/Dec/19 08:00
Start Date: 31/Dec/19 08:00
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: sunjincheng121 commented on issue #10338: [BEAM-8935]
Fail fast if sdk harness startup failed.
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10338#issuecomment-569884513
Good catch! I have not found direct documentation for this question.
However, I did find some useful information which maybe helpful.
According to the
[doc](https://docs.docker.com/engine/api/v1.40/#operation/ContainerList), the
status of a docker container could be one of `created, restarting, running,
removing, paused, exited, dead`. So I think we only need to consider if the
status of a container could be `created` in race conditions after executing
`docker run`(for the other status, it's obvious that there is something wrong).
According to
[StackOverFlow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37744961/docker-run-vs-create),
`docker run = docker create + docker start`. I guess that `docker create` will
change the state of container to `created` and `docker start` will change the
state of container to `running`. It is further explained in
[StackOverFlow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43734412/what-does-created-container-mean-in-docker)
in which case the status of docker container could be "created": `docker
create` and `docker run`. For `docker run`, it says that `Docker container has
been created using docker run but it hasn't been able to start successfully`.
So we can infer that if the docker status become `created` after `docker run`,
the docker container isn't started successfully.
So, I think current logic would be fine :) What do you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 364909)
Time Spent: 50m (was: 40m)
> Fail fast if sdk harness startup failed
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-8935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8935
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java-fn-execution
> Reporter: sunjincheng
> Assignee: sunjincheng
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.19.0
>
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the runner waits for the sdk harness to startup blockingly until
> the sdk harness is available or timeout occurs. The timeout is 1 or 2
> minutes. If the sdk harness startup failed for some reason, the runner may be
> aware of it after 1 or 2 minutes. This is too long.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
